So I don’t see answer choices here, but your answer is 50% of the offspring will be homozygous dominant with RR, and 100% of them will carry a homozygous dominant gene of Rr
If you take the two sets and put them into a punnett square, it would look like this (image attached):
When the two sets of alleles are crossed, you would end up with half of your pairs being fully dominant (RR), and the other half being dominant while containing a recessive gene (Rr). Since there’s only one recessive gene in these pairs, it gets overridden and the pair itself is dominant.
So your answer is 50% will be homozygous dominant with RR!
From the options B is not part of the study of science is : ( B ) The ethics of new developments
Analyzing the evidence gotten from an experimental or research study is a core part of science because that way the scientist can determine if the results obtained are close to the predicted hypothesis or outcome.
Science involves the study of the natural world because all scientific experiments and researches are carried out by studying real life ( natural world ) as study cases. while the ethics of new developments is not controlled or determined by the scientist
Hence we can conclude that the ethics of new developments are not part of the study of science
Learn more : brainly.com/question/497944
In every trophic level, only 10% of energy is passed on.
Grass, with <span>30,000 kJ of energy, is eaten by a zebra.
Zebra then has 10% of 30,000 kJ from the grass, which is 3,000 kJ of energy.
Cheetah then eats the zebra, gaining only 10% of 3,000 kJ of energy of the zebra. Finally as conclusion, cheetah has 300 kJ of energy after having acquired the zebra.</span>
On primary succession newly exposed or newly formed rock is colonized by living things for the first time. And in secondary succession an area that was previously occupied by living things
Its 3 of the same molecule.