I really hope this helps. I’m sure the answer is c:)
The first one might be b or c
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
SAS
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
<u>Before solving the problem, let's define each of the given theorems:</u>
<u>1- SSS (side-side-side):</u> This theorem is valid when the three sides of the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second triangle
<u>2- SAS (side-angle-side):</u> This theorem is valid when two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle
<u>3- ASA (angle-side-angle):</u> This theorem is valid when two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle
<u>4- AAS (angle-angle-side):</u> This theorem is valid when two angles and a side that is not included between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and a side that is not included between them in the second triangle
<u>Now, let's check the given triangles:</u>
We can note that the two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle
This means that the two triangles are congruent by <u>SAS</u> theorem
Hope this helps :)
Keep in mind the the word "percent" translates to "for each 100." 25% can be read as "25 for each 100," which has the fractional representation
and the decimal representation 0.25. All of these representations are just different ways of writing the same value.
Note too that the fraction
can be reduced to
, so what the question is really asking is: 1/4 of what number is 9?
Well, if we know that 1/4 of the number is 9, we can easily find how large the whole number is by finding all 4/4 of it (the <em>whole</em> number)<em /><em />, or 4 x 9, which multiplies out to
36.
