The final decision regarding whether or not an internal audit engagement's goals have been attained rests with the specific internal audit staff member.
Who approves the internal audit plan?
- The governing body and senior management should concur on the internal audit charter.
- The internal audit's scope, independent reporting relationships, authority, responsibility, and requirement to adhere to IIA Standards should all be listed in the charter, at the very least.
Who is in charge of the internal auditing task?
- Usually, the audit committee, the accounting officer, or the board of trustees are responsible for this.
- The internal audit activity needs qualified, competent, and experienced personnel who can operate in accordance with the Code of Ethics and the International Standards if it is to be effective.
Learn more about internal audit plan
brainly.com/question/28236001
#SPJ4
All the time, one full doing is 24 hours
Answer:
South America's predominant democratic regimes and its increasing interdependence on regional trade have not precluded the emergence of militarized crises between Colombia and Venezuela or the revival of boundary claims between Chile and Peru. This way, how can we characterize a zone that, in spite of its flourishing democracy and dense economic ties, remain involved in territorial disputes for whose resolution the use of force has not yet been discarded? This article contends that existing classifications of zones of peace are not adequate to explain this unusual coexistence. Thus, its main purpose is to develop a new analytical category of regional peace for assessing this phenomenon: the hybrid peace. It aims to research the evolution of security systems in South America during the previous century and build a new, threefold classification of peace zones: negative peace zones, hybrid peace zones, and positive peace zones.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
Answer:
<em>The Government of India Act, 1935 was an Act adapted from the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It originally received royal assent in August 1935. It was the longest Act of (British) Parliament ever enacted until Greater London Authority Act 1999 surpassed it. Because of its length, the Act was retroactively split by the Government of India Act, 1935 into two separate Acts:</em>
- <em>The Government of India Act, 1935, having 321 sections and 10 schedules.</em>
- <em>The Government of Burma Act, 1935 having 159 sections and 6 schedules.</em>
