Answer:
Obadiah
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the individual who predicted this was Obadiah. Obadiahis a Biblical name, meaning "servant or slave of God" or "worshiper of Yahweh." In Arabic this individual is translated to Abdullah as a prophet. While the in the Bishops Bible this individual is known as the prohet Abdi.
Answer:
Explosive eruption—beware of ash!
Gases push out magma with great force!
Volcano quietly erupts due to low-viscosity magma!
High silica content of magma results in lava reaching sea level by morning
Explanation:
Answer:
6. Internal rebellions of the 12th century caused the Seljuk Empire to begin to fracture from within. By the mid-1200s, only a small sultanate remained in Anatolia (Turkey).
7. Osman sought to expand his territory (inherited from his father), and called for holy war against the weakening Byzantine Empire (which was right on the edge of his territory, making it a natural expansion of his own territory).
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
Can you explain the question more briefly?
