1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Musya8 [376]
3 years ago
12

How did other countries felt about the U.S entering the Vietnam war?

History
2 answers:
klio [65]3 years ago
7 0

Probably angry because our military sucks

Vedmedyk [2.9K]3 years ago
3 0

Probably not great because the Vietnam war wasn’t fought for freedom it was fought for oil/fossil fuels. Hope this helps :) look into the truth behind the pyramids for an interesting story about history

You might be interested in
Why did the south win most of the early battles of the civil war?
Genrish500 [490]
Most battles were on Southern territory - home ground, with local civilians on their side.

They had a simple and emotive war-aim - to defend the homeland against the invader.

They were a more soldierlike people - used to the riding and shooting way of life.

Some of the best officers in the US Army had resigned to join the Confederates.

In the first half, Lincoln had failed to promote his best Generals.
3 0
3 years ago
O que foi a lei Bill Aberdeen?
frez [133]

want it in English?

The Aberdeen Act of 1845 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (citation 8 & 9 Vict c. 122) passed during the reign Queen Victoria on August 9. The long title of the Act is "An Act to amend an Act, intituled An Act to carry into execution a Convention between His Majesty and the Emperor of Brazil, for the Regulation and final Abolition of the African Slave Trade". The Act was proposed by British Foreign Secretary Lord Aberdeen.

The Act gave the Royal Navy authority to stop and search any Brazilian ship suspected of being a slave ship on the high seas, and to arrest slave traders caught on these ships. The Act stipulated that arrested slave traders could be tried in British courts. The law was designed to suppress the Brazilian slave trade, to make effective Brazilian laws and international treaties to end the Atlantic slave trade, that Brazil had signed since the 1820s, but never enforced.

Portuguese?


<span>O Ato de Aberdeen de 1845 foi um ato do Parlamento do Reino Unido (citação 8 e 9 Vict c. 122) passou durante o reinado Rainha Victoria em 9 de agosto. O título longo da Lei é "Ato para emendar um ato, intitulado "A Lei para levar a cabo uma Convenção entre Sua Majestade e o Imperador do Brasil, para o Regulamento e a Abolição definitiva da Escravatura Africana". O Ato foi proposto pelo Ministro dos Negócios Estrangeiros britânico Lord Aberdeen. O Ato deu à autoridade da Marinha Real para parar e procurar qualquer navio brasileiro suspeitado de ser um navio escravo no alto mar, e para prender traficantes de escravos capturados nesses navios. O Ato estipulava que os comerciantes de escravos presos podiam ser julgados nos tribunais britânicos. A lei foi concebida para suprimir o comércio de escravos no Brasil, para tornar efetivas leis brasileiras e tratados internacionais para acabar com o tráfico de escravos do Atlântico, que o Brasil assinou desde a década de 1820, mas nunca foi aplicado.</span>

<span>Sorry, I used google translate</span>

<span>
</span>


7 0
3 years ago
Read the excerpt from Robert Yates’s notes from the Constitutional Convention on June 11, 1787. Mr. Wilson was of opinion, and t
beks73 [17]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise established that a state’s enslaved population would be counted for partial representation.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement made between delegates during the Constitutional Convention (1787) that established that the number of seats in the House of Representatives for each state should be calculated in accordance to the number of free persons (excluding Indians not taxed) and the three-fifths of slaves in every state. In other words, the Compromise counted three out of every five slaves as people for partial representation. This agreement would increase the power of slave states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Republican Party formed?
Rasek [7]

Answer:

its B

Explanation:

its right on Edge2020

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Where were American Indians sent to live when their land was taken away? Where was it located?​
rjkz [21]

Answer:

They were sent to Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. thats the loction Oklahoma

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 20 points Quickly
    8·2 answers
  • During the Gupta Empire, Gupta leaders paid for the construction of numerous Hindu temples and artworks. True or False
    10·2 answers
  • Which was most challenging to travelers on the Oregon trail in the 1850s
    7·2 answers
  • The two proposed plans for the constitution agreed on
    10·1 answer
  • What is 75/96 in simplest form?
    15·1 answer
  • Who makes laws for the city they govern​
    5·1 answer
  • Porque el poeta en el poema "Otoño " le parece inusual que el otoño llegue más tarde? A- Es una época del año con mucho viento B
    15·1 answer
  • How did disputes and wars change
    13·1 answer
  • The job of the woman’s airforce service pilots was to ?
    11·1 answer
  • List the 3 basic questions that economic systems answer
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!