Existing business with a proven record. When you ask for investments, the lending institution will most definitely ask for your financial track record. They would want to know if you are a good paymaster because they will need the assurance that you can pay them back. Even if you have a really original idea and want to start a new business, there will still be some reservation if you have no track record because the lenders do not know if you are trustworthy or not. Unlike if you already have a proven record that you are a good paymaster, then you at least have proof that you can pay back.
Answer:
Debit legal expense/penalties (p/l) $900,000
Credit Provisions (B/s) $900,000
Explanation:
According to IAS 37 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets, a provision is to be recorded where there is a present obligation as a result of a past event and the outflow of economic benefits to satisfy the obligation is probable.
Hence if it is probable that Scorcese will be liable for $900,000 as a result of this suit, a provision is needed and will be recorded by;
Debit legal expense/penalties (p/l) $900,000
Credit Provisions (B/s) $900,000
In the short-run, the effect on the price level and the real GDP is <em>a. Both the </em><em>price level </em><em>and </em><em>real GDP </em><em>rise.</em>
Since the economy is in long-run equilibrium in 2019, and the stock prices unexpectedly rise and stay high for a long time, it means that the price level does not:
- Rise while the real GDP falls
-
Fall while the real GDP rises
-
Fall with the real GDP.
<u>Question Options</u>:
a. both the price level and real GDP rise.
b. the price level rises and real GDP falls.
c. the price level falls and real GDP rises.
d. both the price level and real GDP fall.
Thus, in the short-term of this economy both the price level and real GDP rise.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/13029724
Answer:
The correct answer is: the A option
If the company is on a tight deadline to complete a major project for an important client
Explanation:
If the company finds itself in difficult times due to work issues, then this weakens the argument for using coercive techniques.
Now, if the company has the luxury of hiring temporary workers to take care of the backlog and finish it on time, then this could further weaken the need for coercion.
If there is a highly skilled workforce, then the use of coercion can result in a reaction from employees. If employees are demotivated by the rigorous work culture, then the use of coercive techniques would only demoralize them further.
