Answer:
The court concluded truthfully, as he had done all the analysis and acknowledged the documentation and investment purposes.
The program scammed funds which might have been used for small-income housing by the government agency.
<em>United States v. McGuire, 744 F.2d 1197 (Cir. 11, 1984).</em>
Answer:
Specific performance
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the order that Wally should seek is known as Specific performance. This is a court order which forces the breaching party to perform the agreed upon act, and by doing so complete the agreed upon specifications set forth by the contract. Failure to do so will find the individual in contempt of court.
February 25th(direct deposit),March 4th(mailed check)
D) Account receivable and note receivable are showing in Expense
