1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tekilochka [14]
3 years ago
10

while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in

the invasion of the USSR
History
1 answer:
Otrada [13]3 years ago
5 0

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

You might be interested in
What was imperialism​
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending a country's rule over foreign nations, often by military force or by gaining political and economic control of other areas.

Imperialism was both normal and common throughout recorded history, the earliest examples dating from the mid-third millennium BC. In recent times, it has been considered morally reprehensible and prohibited by international law. Therefore, the term is used in international propaganda to denounce an opponent's foreign policy.

5 0
3 years ago
What kind of military force did the confederation government have?
IgorC [24]
The kind of military force that <span>the confederation government have can be best described as a weak one. They were not able to force citizens to join the military and this made the military weak. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has come to your desired help.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
The battle of __________ was the turning point of the war in europe, while the battle of __________ was the turning point of the
Temka [501]
The battle of STALINGRAD was the turning point of the war in Europe, while the battle of MIDWAY was the turning point of the war in the pacific
6 0
3 years ago
How did the Byzantine Empire continue the traditions of the Roman Empire? helppp
Delvig [45]
The 2nd one is the correct answer based on the question's topic
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Segregation in the US armed forces was required by Jim Crow laws. Congress. the NAACP. Plessy v. Ferguson.
Dima020 [189]

Segregation in the United States Armed Forces was required by Jim Crow laws.

The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States, promulgated by the white state legislatures, that at the time were dominated by the Democrats after the Reconstruction period between 1876 and 1965. These laws advocated the racial segregation in all public facilities by de jure mandate under the slogan "separate but equal" and applied to African-Americans and other non-white ethnic groups in the states of the United States. In reality, this led to treatment and accommodation being generally inferior to those insured for American whites, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages. The de jure segregation was applied mainly in the southern United States. On the other hand, in the north, segregation was generally de facto predominantly towards blacks who lived in urban ghettos.

Some examples of Jim Crow laws were segregation in public schools, public places, public transportation and the segregation of bathrooms and restaurants; In addition, there were also sources of drinking water for whites and blacks. The US military was also segregated. The Jim Crow laws were derived from the black codes (1800-1866), which had also limited the civil rights and civil liberties of African-Americans.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Select aspects of the Apostle Paul's writing that were presented in the lessons.
    8·2 answers
  • What treaty/document ended the Seven Years War?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Tet Offensive considered a turning point in the Vietnam War?
    11·1 answer
  • What is a force and what happens when it is exerted on an object?
    12·2 answers
  • How did trade play a role in Britain’s becaming a global power
    8·1 answer
  • The "new imperialism" refers to
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the policy of non-alignment
    14·2 answers
  • The 4 accounts of Jesus life in the New Testament were written by...?
    12·2 answers
  • A man is running 500 meters and it takes him 3.5 minutes to finish. How fast is the man running?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an opinlon about the "Illad?"
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!