Two Constitutions: A Comparison
ADA Text Version
US Constitution featuring the words We the PeopleIn many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement… both provide for a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives and a Senate… both seek a system of checks and balances and separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government… and both divide government power between upper and lower levels of government. In the U.S. Constitution the states are subordinate to the federal government, and in the Texas Constitution the counties are subordinate to the state government. But beyond these general features, the two constitutions could not be more different. These differences result from the fact that the two documents arose out of very different historical circumstances and for radically opposite complaints with the document each was meant to replace. With the U.S. Constitution, the problem with the earlier Articles of Confederation was that government was too decentralized and not powerful enough. The U.S. Constitution was designed to overcome these weaknesses and offer a degree of centralization and increased government power. But this is precisely what the Texas Constitution was designed to reverse and avoid. The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted to enable government action; the framers of the Texas Constitution wanted to paralyze government action.
Answer:
Mexico’s Constitution of 1917 helped the working class by protecting the right to strike.
Explanation:
The Mexican National Constitution of 1917 elevated to the constitutional rank the rights of the workers, establishing and regulating the right to strike, the eight-hour labor day, the fixing of a minimum wage, distribution of profits, security measures, dismissal for justified reasons, protection of mothers, abolition of debt peonage, mechanisms of arbitration to resolve conflicts between labor and capital and other stipulations, which made Article 123 the most advanced constitutional article of the time.
A similarity between both was that they worked extremely hard, and sacrificed much to maintain their farms.
I hope this helps!
Good day to you.
-Niko
The answer would be true if you need me to explain let me know
The Battle of El Alamein<span> marked the culmination of the North African campaign between the forces of the British Empire and the German-Italian army commanded in the field by Erwin Rommel in World </span>War<span> II.</span>
