1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bulgar [2K]
3 years ago
14

A state has passed a law making it illegal for people to protest at the state capitol building. You think this law is unconstitu

tional, but your state court system upholds it. What federal branch has the final say on whether your state law is unconstitutional?
History
1 answer:
ruslelena [56]3 years ago
6 0
Judicial branch.
The Supreme court has the power to rule any law unconstitutional, its called judicial review.
You might be interested in
Committee chairpersons are generally
kati45 [8]
The chair<span> sets the </span>committee's<span> agenda, determining when—or in many states, whether—bills will be considered. Other responsibilities of a </span>committee chair<span>typically include: Calling the </span>committee<span> together to perform its duties. Presiding and maintaining order over meetings.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What is democracy?                
Lelu [443]
In the modern usage, a democracy is a system where the people all exercise the power to directly elect representatives from amongst themselves, and thus form a government body, like the Parliament. It is sometimes referred to as the "rule of the majority". Nowadays, this type of rule is the most popular one.
3 0
3 years ago
Find the missing term in the following geometric sequence.
Angelina_Jolie [31]

The correct answer is c. 20, 100

The pattern is that each number multiplied by 5 equals the next number.

4*5 = 20

20*5 = 100

100*5 = 500

Therefore, the correct sequence is C. 4, 20, 100, 500


I really hope this helps you =)

8 0
4 years ago
why didn't the USSR respond with force to the East German and Polish revolts, as they had back in the 50s and 60s?​
lord [1]

Answer:

In opposition to the translations of US intelligence, no arrangements were in progress for even negligible Soviet mediation at the time martial law was forced, as per declassified Soviet archives. On 25 August 1980, an uncommon commission was made in Moscow to figure strategy because of advancements in Poland. It was going by senior Socialist Coalition ideologist Mikhail Suslov, and included KGB administrator Yuri Andropov, unfamiliar clergyman Andrei Gromyko, and safeguard serve Dmitriy Ustinov. They were hesitant to mediate in Poland, reviewing the 1970 Clean fights, and managing issues in the continuous Soviet Afghan War.

The circumstance in Poland in December 1980 had matches with the circumstance in Afghanistan before the Soviet Association in the long run chose to mediate there precisely a year sooner, which prompted results and a deep Soviets' relations with the US.

Explanation:

The Polish revolts of 1980–1981, related with the development of the Fortitude mass development in Poland, tested the Soviet Association's authority over its satellite states in the Eastern Bloc.

Unexpectedly in any case, the Kremlin kept away from military intercession, not at all like on past events, for example, the Prague Spring of 1968 and the Hungarian Transformation of 1956, and along these lines left the Clean initiative under Broad Wojciech Jaruzelski to force martial law to manage the resistance all alone.

3 0
3 years ago
According to the article, why did the British fear local colonial governments in the buildup to the Revolutionary War? A Colonia
marysya [2.9K]

<u>Answer</u>:

According to the article, the British fear local colonial governments in the buildup to the Revolutionary War because D: Colonial governments actively resisted British policies.  

<u>Explanation</u>:

Colonists were quite unhappy from the Britishers. There were several reasons for this. Britishers were taxing colonists but they rebelled. According to them, British were violating their rights and they had no say in the Parliament. So, they did not pay those taxes.

Colonists used to pay taxes to their own local governments. This way they had a say in the tax laws.  Also, colonists wanted to expand towards the west and claim the land Great Britain received after the 'French-Indian war'.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did lyndon b johnson extend hoovers tenure beyond the mandatory retirement age
    9·1 answer
  • A republic is a form of government in which the people
    14·2 answers
  • Should a defendant have the right to appeal his district court decision in an appeals court.
    14·1 answer
  • Most ethical dilemmas can be solved using only one of the approaches of decision making. true or false?
    15·1 answer
  • In the early 1830's, the majority of workers in the textile mills of Massachusetts were young unmarried women from rural New Eng
    15·1 answer
  • Why was it difficult for the United States to remain neutral in the war between
    10·1 answer
  • Trade with Europe and the Middle East affected the Byzantine Empire by:
    5·2 answers
  • Which two agricultural contributions are common to both Northeast Woodland Indians and Southeast Indians?
    12·1 answer
  • Any one can help with this plato question?​
    7·1 answer
  • Who were the first permanent white settlers in oregon
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!