Answer:
e) directional selection
Explanation:
Directional Selection:
- The type of natural selection that favors one of the extremes of the phenotype spectrum, shifting the allele frequency to one direction
- This type of selection selects against intermediate and one of the extreme phenotypes.
- In this particular case, the increasing pollution has pushed the plants to evolve better acid tolerance.
- This indicates that if the environmental conditions worsen, only the acid tolerant plants will be able to survive.
* Another example is illustrated in the image. The graph shows the shifts in allele frequency.
Answer:
People throw their trash and pollution into the fresh water and make it not as fresh or safe to the animals as much as it could be.
Explanation:
Note that it is asking for conservation and management of water:
Use technology to produce clean water. If technology can be used to create more clean water without losing natural resources, by all means use technology for it.
Use water wisely at home and in industry. This is the definition of conserving water and managing usage of water.
Use techniques and tools to reduce water loss. This is the pathway to conserving water.
Those that are in a grey area:
Take care of living things that live in water. This should occur, and it is managing the water condition, but as for conserving water, that is a different story.
Encourage recreational activities year-round. Recreational activities usually do not have to do with water in a major way, but year-round is a bit too much. Of course, if all these recreational activities use large amounts of water, then it will end up in the "not" section.
Those that are not:
Stop using water in all areas of life. You will need to drink water first off, and a human cannot survive for longer than 3 days without water. You also need water to help you stay clean, as well as other tasks.
Your definite correct answers are the first 3 listed, and the 2 after is up to how you view if it is both managing as well as conserving water.
~
<span>Many exonerations are not based on DNA evidence, but on the discovery that prosecutors had ignored or TAMPERED evidence. Tampering evidence significantly damages the reputation of the prosecution in this case and since verdicts must be done "beyond reasonable doubt" any doubt will weaken the accusation and might result in a review of the case and subsequently an exoneration.</span>
Answer:
Hi Hi really sorry may i get some points i need them to give it to other people cuz some people want points, ik its not the answer u wanted sorry but hope u get the answer soon!
Explanation:
