Let's start by plugging in 1 for y. You get 7-2/6, which is 5/6. The other equation is 3-7/12, which equals -1/3. Now let's try 10. You get 7-2(10)/6, which is -13/6. The other equation is 3(10)-7/12, which is 23/12, and is larger!
1 is a value of y that could work!
Hope this helps!! :)
You would convert 17 1/4 to 17 4/16, and change 7/8 to 14/16. Then you would add those 2 numbers together to get 17 18/16 or simplified, 18 1/8.
Answer:
(A) It would have to lie on AB because DC would rotate halfway around M. B would lie on D and A would lie on C.
(B) AD would lie on the BC line. D would lie on B and A would lie on C.
(C) The Lines CD and AD would only intersect if one line had to rotate 180 degrees around M.
40000=5000e^30r
40000/5000=e^30r
R=(log(40000/5000)/log(e))/30)*100
R=6.93%
Answer:
Yes, there is enough information to prove that the triangles are congruent.
SAS POSTULATE
Step-by-step explanation:
