Answer:
Customers
Explanation:
According to my research on Economics, I can say that based on the information provided within the question in this hypothetical situation, Customers are acting as an external force for change. These external forces refers to any factor outside a certain business or organization that will affect the business in one way or another, either for good or bad. In this scenario the customers not shopping at the store is an external force that is negatively affecting sales for the business.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span>allows child to create empathy and understand how behavior can affect others</span>
Answer:
The correct answers are:
Qualitative; quantitative
Explanation:
According to Piaget's theory, the cognitive approach in children changes in a qualitative way since human beings develop their capacities in different ways as they grow and get mature, processing the acquired information in different ways as well. He says it happens in a qualitative manner, more than a process of accumulation of information where more and more information is stored.
On the other hand according to the information-processing approach which is mainly adopted by cognitive psychologists, the knowledge acquisition is mainly based on a quantitative model, in which information is processed according to the number of experiences and storage of information that will be used when necessary. This model is generally compared to that of a computer in which an amount of information can be stored to use later.
A treaty is a formally concluded & ratified agreement between countries. an exective agreement is an international agreement made by the executive branch o the us gov without ratification by the senate. executive agreements are made for routine administrative matters where a treaty isnt necessary
<em>The answer is A. You could add statement A to the claim 3 as a supporting sentence. </em>
The outline is a little bit unbalanced as regards the supporting ideas. I would eliminate sentence C from claim 3. It doesn't contribute to the claim's main idea and it's just a generalization but not an important piece of information.
Also, you could make a separate claim related to the government's role in a free enterprise system and use sentences C, D, and C (from the last part) to support it.
