Answer:
<u>Retained earnings under the Balance sheet</u>
Explanation:
Making comparisons between the two inventory value when using FIFO or Average cost method=
63.0M - 47.1M = $15.9M
We see an <em>increase</em> in the ending inventory.
Thus, this increase in income has been unprecedented, and may not have been distributed to the shareholders of Adonis Industries. On the balance sheet journal entry this extra income would be indicted on the balance sheet on the retained earnings column for year 2021.
The law of Diminishing returns states that as successive units of a variable resource are added to a fixed resource, beyond some point, the marginal product will decline.
<h3>What is the
law of Diminishing returns?</h3>
The law of diminishing returns explains that when an investment in a particular area increases there will be a stop at the rate of profit from that investment, after a certain point.
Learn more about the law of Diminishing returns at brainly.com/question/17169713
#SPJ1
Answer:
The current ratio is 1.18 times
Explanation:
Current Ratio: The current ratio is that ratio which shows a relationship between the current assets and the current liabilities
The computation of the current ratio is shown below
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
where,
Total current assets = Cash + short-term investments + net accounts receivable + merchandise inventory
= $43,500 + $27,000 + $102,000 + $125,000
= $297,500
And, the total current liabilities is $251,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the ratio would equal to
= $297,500 ÷ $251,000
= 1.18 times
The long term note payable is not a current liabilities,hence it is not considered in the computation part.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Professional skepticism is an examining mindset which makes you conscious of the situations that may suggest possible error or scam as well as a critical evaluation of audit facts.
Answer:
What you could tell him is that you can offer to help him review all the plans appeal process as well as to help him ask the plan to review his coverage decision which will enable him to know why he had large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that when he received the bill, their was large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit which is a limit on the amount of money a person or an individual have to pay for covered medical care services in which we were still told that the large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit also include a number of services and items he thought would be fully covered, therefore since he called you to ask what he could do, What you could tell him is that you will offer to help him review all the plans appeal process and to as well help him to ask the plan to review the coverage decision which is why coverage decision is of benefit because it enables a person or an individual to makes decision about their benefits including the amount they have to pay for their medical services plan.
