A lack of quality time spent with children decreases the likelihood that living in a dual-career family will be a positive experience for a child.
Dual-career family in which both heads of household pursue careers and at the same time maintain a family life together. Both have high degrees of commitment to their careers, and neither partner's career is thought to be more important than that of the other.
- Advantage of being a dual career family is that you can get to share a common goal which helps focus their individual lifestyles.
- Disadvantage of dual-career family is the struggle to balance all the demands of life is amplified in a dual-career marriage. The decision of when to have children, what country to live in and the way to balance family time and work can all cause conflicts.
To know more about dual-career family here
brainly.com/question/3229400
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
The group that was part of the rising middle class of the Sung period was Shopkeepers.
The gentry and the peasants were the two big divisions of the social classes during the Song period in ancient China.
The Emperor of China was at the very top of the pyramid. He was the most powerful man in the empire and the absolute ruler of the lands.
In the second place were the families who owned big portions of land or better known as the gentry. Then, the peasants. They were the ones that farmed the agriculture fields and worked for the landowners.
The merchants were at the bottom of the pyramid. They were able to earn some good money in trade transactions but an old belief system of the time said that the merchants took advantage of other people's work and made a profit selling the products.
However, these merchants or shopkeepers flourished during the Song period.
I think a governments role in promoting social standard are fun
Answer:
A or D
Explanation:
Federalists supported the ratification of the new Constitution and believed a more robust national government with greater powers was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country. Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and believed power should be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government.
