Answer:
intuition
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the MBTI dimension that is being described is intuition. This refers to an individual which is intuitive, future-oriented, and imaginative among other things. Which is what Karl is being described as since he is imaginitive and trusts his hunches (intuitive).
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
According to A<span>ndrew Cherlin, Americans are faced with the difficulty to commit to one person in his/her lifetime - a term called polyarmous. In actuality, this is not the case for americans only but can also be possible to all nationals. Love is always applicable to all.</span>
<span>Emperor Theodosius I :)
"</span>Emperor Theodosius I, who made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire. Nicene Christianity became the state church of the Roman Empire with the Edict of Thessalonica in 380 CE, when Emperor Theodosius I<span> made it the Empire's sole authorized religion"</span>
The correct answer is decreased.
When the teachers in Milgram's study were ordered to administer shocks to others on the phone, their level <span>of obedience decreased compared to when they were given orders in person. A explanation for this is that lack of physical proximity and real time feedback and reactions from the experimenter was absent during phone calls. Due to this it was easier for teachers to disobey the experimenter's commands. </span>