1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dominik [7]
3 years ago
7

In england, the doctrine that allowed the courts to hold protective jurisdiction over all children was called:

History
1 answer:
slega [8]3 years ago
6 0
In England, the doctrine that allowed the courts to hold protective jurisdiction over all children was called parents patriae.
You might be interested in
The U.S. Supreme Court case plessy v.Ferguson determined fbT segregation was acceptable under the condition
o-na [289]

In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that facilities that were "separate but equal" were permissible under the US Constitution.

This allowed the Jim Crow laws to develop wherein African Americans went to different schools, ate at different restaurants or in different sections, and were generally segregated from the population

6 0
3 years ago
The quote is from a United States supreme court ruling "The constitutional issue we decide is the admissibility use of statement
Olin [163]

WHAT IS THE QUESTION

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
If the soviets had been true to karl marx’s theory of communism, what would they have done? a. created the most powerful army in
omeli [17]

If the soviets had been true to karl marx’s theory of communism, what they would have done is: c. turned ownership of farmlands over to the workers.

<h3>Karl marx’s theory of communism</h3>

Had it been the soviets was true based on karl marx’s theory of communism they could have handed the ownership of farmland to the workers.

By replacing property owns by private individual to  public ownership.

Learn more about Karl marx’s theory of communism here:brainly.com/question/3624654

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
was the trial of tears necessary to advance civilization as president Jackson said, or a cruel injustice to the cherokee
kaheart [24]
This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think Winston Churchill was a good choice for Britain’s prime minister? Explain your answer.
nikdorinn [45]
YES! he had the right attitude and life style  of his skills!!!
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did technology play a role in an opening southeast Asia and the Pacific to foreign influence?
    5·1 answer
  • Journalists who wrote about corruption in business and politics, hoping that their articles would lead to public awareness and r
    6·1 answer
  • In what why did england use mercantilism to control north american colonies
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the medium that creates sand dunes
    13·2 answers
  • What was the main reason Loyalists opposed independence from Britain?
    9·2 answers
  • What right did the English nobles gain from King John signing the Magna Carta? Parliament would be required to meet once a year.
    7·2 answers
  • 20 points please help!!
    11·1 answer
  • School-relayed- This is a survey for my journalism class. Comment yes or no and reasons why!
    7·2 answers
  • What was the policy of appeasement in WWII​
    10·1 answer
  • What were the consequences of the 1871 law banning recognition of Indian nations or tribes ?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!