Answer:
The option that best demonstrates the historical interpretation that democracy in America was expanded in the 1820s and 1830s is:
Permanent institutionalization of the political party system (1836).
The event that supported this was the formation of two main political parties: the Democratic Party and the Republic (Whig) Party.
The reason that "Non-renewal of the charter of the Bank of the national bank (1836)" is not as useful as an evidence that democracy in America expanded in the time of the 1820s and 1830s is that the issue was not for the political parties to decide. It was Congress that exercised the right to renew the charter, which President Andrew Jackson vetoed.
Explanation:
The party system institutionalization in the United States happened with the formation of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party (formerly the Whig Party). These party systems brought stability in governance and lowered populism in political structure. They gave the parties the opportunity to develop internally and foster better public policies.
That his system contains ceramics from the north and south of the country
4 states? what exactly is the question asking
Why did the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. United States (1944) anger supporters of civil liberties?
Answer: Out of all the options presented above the one that represents the reason why it made supporters of civil liberties angry is answer choice B) It made the internment of certain American citizens legitimate. As we already know the wartime policy toward Japanese Americans was confinement in internment camps.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Media coverage gives voters an impression of the candidates.
Because much of media coverage comes in very brief news segments and even short "sound bites," it tends to provide an impression of the candidates, without necessarily providing in-depth presentation and analysis of their views. This varies, of course, depending on which "media" you have in mind with the question. Committed news organizations which employ highly skilled journalists will do deeper pieces on candidates and their views or policies -- see, for instance, articles in The New York Times or Washington Post or The Atlantic.
There are many new forms of media--such as social media websites and politically-aligned cable networks--where people can go to get biased perspectives and be told how to vote or not to vote. But the most respected media outets strive to present a full picture and cover all candidates. Still, because most voters will watch or read only portions of news media coverage, the best answer is that media tends to give voters an impression of candidates -- which sometimes is less complete than the full picture.
