Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The answer is yes because education/training will make it so you have more experience/knowledge than the next worker
Answer:
=$59,000.00
Explanation:
Original investments:
Xavier: $50,000.00
Yolanda $ 100,000.00
Allowances:
Xavier: $ 34,000.00
Yolanda : $ 26,000.00
Income at $120,000.00
Xavier allocation will be:
Calculating interest on the original investment
Xavier =20/100x $50,000.00 =$10,000.00
Yolanda=20/100 x$100,000.00 = $20,000.00
Total interest on original investments = $30,000.00
Total allowances = $34,000+$26000=$60,000.00
Shareable income= $120,000.00- ($30,000+$60,000)
= $30,000
each gets $15,000.00
Xavier will get $ 15,000 + $ 10,000 +$ 34,000
=$59,000.00
Answer:
The mission of the institute is to promote agricultural science and to train manpower for agricultural development focusing on teaching, research and extension.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) $22,010
b) $3,780
c) $25,790
Explanation:
a) In calculating the value of inventory still left, the total value needs to be calculated first,
= (80 freezers * $540) + $820 ( transport fees)
= 43,200 + 820
= $44,020
40 out of 80 freezers have not been sold so,
= 40/80 * 44,020
= $22,010
b) In calculating the profit, subtract the expenses from the sales
Sales = 40 * 700
= $28,000
= 28,000 - Cost of refrigerators - commission of 6% of sales - advertising - installation
= 28,000 - 22,010 - (28,000*0.06) - 180 - 350
= $3,780
c) The amount remitted by the consignor will be,
= Sales - commission - advertising - installation
= 28,000 - (28,000 * 0.06) - 180 - 350
= $25,790
Answer:
a. CPA exam review course $0
b. Law school expenses $4,000
Explanation:
1a. CPA exam review course will be $0 because the IRS has disallowed any costs that will lead to qualifying for a different trade .
1b. The Law School expenses will be $4,000 . Based on section 222, Samantha is been limited to $4,000 of the tuition paid.
Therefore the balance of $650 is excess tuition $200 + $450 books which will not qualify under the regular education expense deduction due to the negative position of the IRS on law school costs.