Answer:
If the units are reworked, income will increase by $5,800.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of units= 1,000
Sell as-is= $4.3
Rework cost= $2.8
Selling price= $12.9
<u>Because the original cost will remain constant in both options, we will not take them into account.</u>
Sell as-is:
Effect on income= 1,000*4.3= $4,300
Rework:
Effect on income= 1,000*(12.9 - 2.8)
Effect on income= $10,100
If the units are reworked, income will increase by $5,800.
Answer:
ALL OF THE ABOVE
Explanation:
Behavioral finance is an interesting mix of psychology and finance which deals with the effect of psychology on the behavior of investors.
Looking at the options given in the scenario they all show traits of investors behaving in a way that portrays psychological reaction
Hence it can be concluded that Problems with behavioral finance include ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
I. The behavioralists tell us nothing about how to exploit any irrationality.
II. The implications of behavioral patterns are inconsistent from case to case, sometimes suggesting overreaction, sometimes underreaction.
III. As with technical trading rules, behavioralists can always find some pattern in past data that supports a behavioralist trait.
Answer: C) Interactionist view of conflict.
Explanation:
The Interactionist view of conflict is a conflict school of thought that pushes the idea that conflict within a group can be a good thing.
It even goes further to state that conflict is necessary for a group to function effectively because it gets the group to compete and try to be the best thereby improving the general effectiveness of the group.
Some of those team members who took great delight in stirring the pot at team meetings are indeed steering up conflict and do look like they subscribe to this school of thought.
Answer:
7.42%
Explanation:
Value = 500 million
Amount of debt = 200 million
Time = year
Volatility = 6%
Risk free rate = 0.05
Nd1 = 0.9720
Nd2 = 0.9050
We have to calculate the value =
500 - (500 x 0.9720 - 200 x e^-0.05 x 0.9050)
= 186.17 million
We now calculate the yield
(200/186.17)^1 - 1
= 0.0742
= 7.42%
It is "cutting out the middleman", which seeks to reduce distribution expenses.
By avoiding the middleman, i.e. offering straightforwardly to you, the maker can list that equivalent item for, say $75 which because of a broker or retailer rises to at least 100 $, which it to appear is a lot of difference to the buyer, while in the meantime giving them significantly more benefit than they'd make selling to a store.
