Answer:
The answer is: remain the same
Explanation:
The marginal utility of a good or service is how much better we feel when consuming an extra unit of that good or service. For example if we are very thirsty, the marginal utility of consuming a can of Coke is very large, but once our thirst is quenched, an extra can of Coke will not provide use with that much satisfaction as before.
If the price of a substitute good increases, the marginal utility of the good whose price didn't change, will remain the same.
Let's go back to the Coke example. An extra can of Coke will give me 5 more satisfaction units (I'm assuming I can measure satisfaction) and an extra slice of pizza will give me 7 more units of satisfaction. If the price of Coke increases from 50 cents to $1, its marginal utility will decrease. I will buy more pizza because the satisfaction I get from drinking Coke is now smaller.
<span>Often take a commission for their service. The commission could be a flat rate or a percentage of the check. Generally banks do not charge their customers to cash checks. A bank may charge a small fee to cash a check if the person is not their customer.</span>
Answer:
Air France should have recognized the Revenue in month of APRIL.
Explanation:
According to the revenue recognition concept the revenue should be recognized when it is realizable. When goods or services are tranferred or rendered to the customer. It doesn't matter matter when the payment is received. Payment received in advance should be recorded as unearned revenue rather as revenue. On the other hand payment doesn't received until the transfer of goods or services, a receivable will be made in result of revenue recognition entry. Air France should recognize the revenue on April 5, when the flight took placed and services are performed. Sale of ticked on January 26 will be recorded as unearned revenue and a receivable on the other hand. The receivable will be adjusted on February 4 when cash is received and the revenue will be recognized on April 5 when flight took place.
Answer:
$2.25 per unit
Explanation:
The computation of the cost per equivalent is shown below:
= Total conversion cost ÷ total units completed
where,
Total conversion cost is
= Beginning work in process conversion cost + cost of conversion added
= $20,250 + 271,125
= 291,375
And, the number of units is
= Units completed + work in process ending inventory units × completion percentage
= 115,700 units + 23,000 units × 60%
= 115,700 + 13,800
= 129,500 units
So, the cost per equivalent unit for conversion cost is
= $291,375 ÷ 129,500 units
= $2.25 per unit