I believe the answer is: Case study
Case study refers to a form of research that includes in-depth and detailed examination toward a certain subject study as its method of collecting data. Case study is the type of research that's the most popular by researchers in formal work background/ settings.
One reason that some african americans were patriots was because a few of the high people during that time were racist. (This does not just go to african americans. White people were also patriots)
One reason that some african americans were loyalists was because some of the people that were in high power were actually african americans. These high powered african americans were not interfered with, due to there were many other people that bad guys wanted to turn into patriots. (DURING THIS TIME, very few african americans were in high power)
I hope that this helped! Please! Please! Please do not feel offended! I was only answering your question! And I caps locked "during this time" because this racist situation was only a big problem during the american revolution.
Wundtian psychology in Germany was slow to develop because <u>"it was not seen as having practical value".</u>
The trouble was that Wundt's psychology, with its emphasis on depicting and organizing the components of cognizance, was not exceptionally valuable for taking care of genuine issues. Maybe that was one motivation behind why Wundt's psychology did not flourish in the even minded culture of the United States. Wundt moved toward brain research as an absolutely scholastic science; he had no enthusiasm for applying his brain research to down to earth concerns. In this manner, regardless of its far reaching acknowledgment at colleges in numerous different countries, Wundtian brain research at home in Germany was moderately slow to create as a distinct science.
<span>The greatest example of Humanism was an individual - Erasmus of Rotterdam (c. 1466-1536). Humanism influenced the growth of learning by "abandoning medieval pieties in favour of a rich new vision of the individual's potential."</span>
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).