Traditional cyberspace operational task is to permanently, completely, and irreparably deny access to, or operation of, a targeted function for the foreseeable scope of the conflict.
Cyberspace, according to the Department of Defense, is the fictitious space in which digital information is transmitted over computer networks. The DOD's regular business operations in and through cyberspace are made up of its military, intelligence, and intelligence-related activities. Military operations in cyberspace employ cyberspace capabilities to produce effects that aid operations in both the physical and cyberspace domains. In order to carry out national security duties, cyberspace operations are carried out under the jurisdiction of the judicial branch. Traditional threats typically come from states using well-known military tactics and recognized military forces. Non-intelligence activities make up cyberspace OPE and serve as the foundation for subsequent operations.
More about cybersecurity brainly.com/question/26260220
#SPJ4
Answer: Northerners became strong opponents of the strengthened Fugitive Slave Act, which was part of the compromise.
Explanation:
The 1850 compromise is the bill that was approved by the United States Congress to lessen the conflict between the southerners (slavers) and the northerners (free states).
Among the agreements that were to be reached with the compromise are; the status that the lands obtained from Mexico should have, whether they should be free states or slave states. There was also a desire to negotiate the Fugitive Slave Act, which determined that slaves fleeing to the north must be returned to their owners, but the northerners refused to comply.
The agreement was intended to maintain the union between the states, however, no agreement was reached.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer And Explanation:
False sciences or pseudopsychology here do not change as t
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
