Picture relating to the question is attached below :
Answer:
Esmerelda did not use the recipro al of the Divisor.
Esmerelda added the numerator
Esmerelda added the denominator
Explanation:
Esmerelda's work:
-5 1/4 ÷ 3/2= -21/4 ÷3/2 = (-21/4)(3/2) = -24/6 = - 4
Esmerelda's errors:
When changing the quotient sign to multiplication ; the reciprocal of the denominator should be used to divide the numerator :
Hence,
-21/4 ÷3/2 = (-21/4)(3/2) (wrong expression)
-21/4 ÷3/2 = (-21/4)(2/3) (correct expression)
Also,
(-21/4)(3/2) = -24/6 ( wrong simplification)
The bracket symbol indicates multiplication. Hence, the values should be multiplied. The two Numerator values and the two denominator values.
If Bluebird accepts this additional business, the incremental cost will be: c. $33,750.
Using this formula
Incremental cost=Number of order for feeders× Variable cost
Where:
Number of order for feeders=15,000 feeders
Variable cost=$2.25
Let plug in the formula
Incremental cost=15,000×$2.25
Incremental cost=$33,750
Inconclusion if Bluebird accepts this additional business, the incremental cost will be: c. $33,750.
Learn more here:<em>brainly.com/question/16252703</em>
<em />
Solution :
It is a case of surrogacy issue.
Here in the context, Penelope and Goldberg signed a contract individually for entering in to a surrogacy contract where Penelope Barr will be the surrogate mother for Mr. and Mrs. Goldberg. Under this contract, Penelope had taken $ 20,000 at the staring and will be paid another $ 20,000 after she delivers the baby and hands it over to the Goldberg family.
But after giving birth, Penelope did not wished to hand over the baby to Goldberg family as per the contract signed.
Penelope breached the contract which is illegal.
A trial judge of Nevada is finding it difficult to come to a conclusion and enforce the contract of surrogate motherhood. As surrogacy is legal in Nevada, and according to the contract signed between the two parties, Penelope should give the child to Mr. and Mrs. Goldberg.
In this case, none of the "precedents" must be followed. But the judge can adopt the valuable reasoning of these states court only if the judge finds the reasoning persuasive.
Answer:
b. Manufacturing Overhead Control.
Explanation:
As we know that, indirect labor cost is a manufacturing overhead which deals with all types of indirect cost like - indirect material, indirect labor, Factory machinery depreciation, rent, and salaries expense to the manufacturing personnel, etc
These are the costs that are not directly connected to the product's production.
So, in the given case, the indirect labor cost is normally recorded to the debit side of the manufacturing overhead control account
