Answer:
Alternation ranking method.
Explanation:
Tony, a production manager at Brighton Biometrics, needs to measure the performance of 10 subordinates. He writes their names on a paper and circles Paula's name as the best-performing employee of the group. He then circles Erma's name as the worst employee of the group. He rates the remaining employees as second best, second worst, and so on. In the context of methods of performance measurement, Tony is using the alternation ranking method.
This method basically ranks employees from the very best to the worst based on a particular trait. Choosing the highest down to the lowest until every one of them are ranked.
The approaches would be the best way for Charice to communicate this to her manager is Send an email to her manager requesting a meeting to talk in person about her concerns. Mark the importance level as high. Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
Answer:
0.5
Explanation:
Marginal propensity to consume is the proportion of the increase in disposable income spent on consumption.
Marginal propensity to consume = change in consumption/ increase in disposable income
$500 / $1000 = 0.5
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The company's cost to produce 1,000 gallons of product B is $7,131.25.
Explanation:
This can be calculatd as follows:
Product B share of joint cost = (Product B sales value / (Product B sales value + Product A sales value)) * Cost to split-off point = ($32.20 / ($32.20 + $3.00)) * $5,500 = 0.914772727272727 * $5,500 = 5,031.25
Product B total additional separable process beyond split-off = Additional cost per gallon * Number of gallons of product B produced = $2.10 * 1,000 = $2,100
Therefore, we have:
Company's cost to produce 1,000 gallons of product B = Product B share of joint cost + Product B total additional separable process beyond split-off = 5,031.25 + $2,100 = $7,131.25
Therefore, the company's cost to produce 1,000 gallons of product B is $7,131.25.
