Single broken along with a single solid yellow line means traffic on either side may cross the center line to pass another vehicle
.
Option - C
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Traffic signals are to be followed to protect us from accidents and making accidents. If rules are followed as per the signals there will be smooth flow of traffic on the either side of the road.
One mistake by a person may lead to fatal accidents. To overtake a vehicle you have to do it at the right point where the traffic lines are drawn. For that purpose the Single broken yellow line is the point where the other vehicle can overtake.
If we are driving on side of the broken yellow line we are allowed to overtake the other vehicles. But if we are driving on the side of solid yellow line, we cannot overtake.
Okay, think of an essay or paragraph as like stating your opinion. Here’s how to break it down so it’s a little easier:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction.
Provide background information on the topic. Give about 1-2 sentences on what the topic is about, and for the 3rd sentence, put in a statement that IS your argument.
For example, “French fries are the best food ever because they are delicious.”
Paragraph 2 - Conflict.
Elaborate on your argument/thesis statement. Since that seems to be your conflict, describe something hard you’ve been through. What was hard about it? How did it affect you?
Paragraph 3 - Response
Elaborate more on how the conflict affected you personally. If you can, try to connect it to a bigger picture or theme.
For example, “I broke my leg in middle school as a result of a basketball injury. Therefore, we should eliminate school sports because they cause injuries.”
It’s a reach, but that’s the entire point of connecting to a bigger theme.
Paragraph 4 - Explain Response
Here is where you’re going to connect your response in paragraph 3 to a bigger picture. Talk about the outcome and effect you showed in paragraph 3.
The questions mentioned should help you- break it down in a way that you understand. I tried to simplify this for you in the easiest way possible, I hope it helps and good luck :)
I believe that the answer to the question provided above is
(1)<span> </span>Formulate the maxim
<span>(2) Generalize the maxim into a law of nature</span>
<span>(3) Figure out the perturbed social world (PSW), that is, what the world would be like if this law</span> of nature were added to existing laws of nature and things had a chance to reach equilibrium.<span> </span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
Answer:if done effectively you will be prepared for college
Explanation:
Answer:
The different positions of the political party must face each trial they are planning on solving throughout their presidency. The parties both represent different different therefore having a different call on each situation obviously but they represent each party based on the point of view they see each problem in and both parties basically disagree on most things one party might have one point of view on handling systematic racism another can have a different point of view, one position can have a certain opinion about the healthcare system that the other disagrees with, one position can have a certain opinion about Underpaid teachers and Low wage employees and the other can have another. What I am saying here is that both parties have different opinion that will represent their party and most of the time both of the parties/ positions will be in disagreement.
Explanation:
