1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blsea [12.9K]
3 years ago
5

Who was the General in command of American forces during World War I? Allenby Pershing Mitchell

History
2 answers:
Ber [7]3 years ago
7 0
John Pershing was promoted to General of the Armies during World War I, the highest rank ever held in the United States Army. He <span>led the American Expeditionary Force in Europe with nearly two million men under his command,</span>
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is:

Pershing

John J. Pershing (1860-1948)  was an U.S. Army general who commanded the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) in Europe during World War I. Pershing is the only American to be promoted in his own lifetime to General of the Armies rank, the highest possible rank in the United States Army

You might be interested in
Which statements about the woodcarvings made by the Zapotec people in the Oaxaca Valley, Mexico, are true? Choose all answers th
AnnyKZ [126]
If I am correct it is C
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What way did relationship Soviet Union change after World War II
strojnjashka [21]

<span>Wartime relations between the United States and the Soviet Union can be considered one of the highpoints in the longstanding interaction between these two great powers.  Although not without tensions--such as differing ideological and strategic goals, and lingering suspicions--the collaborative relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union nonetheless was maintained.  Moreover, it was instrumental in defeating Nazi Germany in 1945.</span><span>The United States greeted the democratic Russian Revolution of February 1917 with great enthusiasm, which cooled considerably with the advent of the Bolsheviks in October 1917.  The United States, along with many other countries, refused to recognize the new regime, arguing that it was not a democratically elected or representative government.  The policy of non-recognition ended in November 1933, when the United States, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, established full diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, the last major power to do so.</span><span>Despite outwardly cordial relations between the two countries, American misgivings regarding Soviet international behavior grew in the late 1930s.  The August 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact, which paved the way for Hitler’s invasion of Poland in September, followed by the Soviet invasion of Poland’s eastern provinces of Western Ukraine and Western Byelorussia, caused alarm in Washington.  The Soviet attack on Finland in November 1939, followed by Stalin’s absorption of the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in 1940, further exacerbated relations.</span><span>The Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, however, led to changes in American attitudes. The United States began to see the Soviet Union as an embattled country being overrun by fascist forces, and this attitude was further reinforced in the aftermath of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941.  Under the Lend-Lease Act, the United States sent enormous quantities of war materiel to the Soviet Union, which was critical in helping the Soviets withstand the Nazi onslaught.  By the end of 1942, the Nazi advance into the Soviet Union had stalled; it was finally reversed at the epic battle of Stalingrad in 1943.  Soviet forces then began a massive counteroffensive, which eventually expelled the Nazis from Soviet territory and beyond.  This Soviet effort was aided by the cross-channel Allied landings at Normandy in June 1944.</span><span>These coordinated military actions came about as the result of intensive and prolonged diplomatic negotiations between the Allied leaders, Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin, who became known as the “Big Three.”  These wartime conferences, which also sought to address issues related to the postwar world, included the November 1943 Tehran Conference.  At Tehran, Stalin secured confirmation from Roosevelt and Churchill of the launching of the cross-channel invasion.  In turn, Stalin promised his allies that the Soviet Union would eventually enter the war against Japan.  In February 1945, the "Big Three" met at Yalta in the Crimea.  The Yalta Conference was the most important--and by far the most controversial--of the wartime meetings. </span><span>Recognizing the strong position that the Soviet Army held on the ground, Churchill--and an ailing Roosevelt--agreed to a number of things with Stalin.  At Yalta, they granted territorial concessions to the Soviet Union, and outlined punitive measures against Germany, including Allied occupation and the principle of reparations.  Stalin guaranteed that the Soviet Union would declare war on Japan within 6 months after the end of hostilities in Europe.</span><span>While the diplomats and politicians engaged in trying to shape the postwar world, Soviet forces from the east and Allied forces from the west continued to advance on Germany.  After a fierce and costly battle, Berlin fell to Soviet forces on May 8, 1945, after Allied and Soviet troops had met on the Elbe River to shake hands and congratulate each other on a hard won impending victory<span>.  </span>Although the war in Europe was over, it would take several more months of hard fighting and substantial losses for Allied forces to defeat the Japanese in September 1945, including the first use of the atomic bomb.  In accordance with the Yalta agreements, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan in early August 1945, just prior to Japan’s surrender in September.</span><span>The alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union during World War II developed out of necessity, and out of a shared realization that each country needed the other to defeat one of the most dangerous and destructive forces of the twentieth century.  Ideological differences were subordinated, albeit temporarily, to the common goal of defeating fascism.  As a result of this cooperation, the groundwork for a new international system was laid, out of which came the United Nations organization.  </span>

 

3 0
3 years ago
In a paragraph explain who do u think is the most powerful Greek god Zeus, Poseidon, or Hades and why? plz help me
algol [13]

Answer:

It would probably be Zeus.

Explanation:

it would be Zeus because first of all, he's the king of the gods. Meaning,he was basically the "boss". And add to fact that he was always honored in the Greek cities, back then.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a short play about one of the following three explorers: Henry Hudson, John Cabot, or Jacques Cartier
Temka [501]

Answer:

hope that helps

Explanation:

it will be nice if you Mark this answer as the brainliest answer ❤❤

6 0
3 years ago
What geographical features of China led to the growth of cities
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The geographical things that led to growth of cities would be because of water lakes/rivers, crops, farming, construction, and more agriculture!

China has transformed itself in just a few decades from a rural, low-income nation to a booming urban system, displaying rates of economic development and social change that are unprecedented in history for a nation of its size. As recently as the mid-20th century, China’s economy was dominated by its primary sector and urbanized areas provided only a minor part to the value creation of the national economy. The vast majority of the population lived in rural areas, accounting for an urbanization rate of only 20% as recently as in 1975 [1]. Within a few decades this picture changed completely: by 2011, more than half of the Chinese population lived in urban areas and the contribution of the primary sector to the national economy in terms of value became almost negligible.

The explosive growth of Chinese cities and the general demographic and economic restructuring of the country via massive urbanization are the principal manifestations of this monumental transformation [2]. Certain quantities, such as GDP, land area, and road length [3, 4], follow scaling laws also in the Chinese urban system. However, relatively little is known quantitatively about the development trajectory of Chinese cities among other quantities on the aggregate. Specifically, whether their growth and development have parallels in past historical examples in other nations and show similar patterns of agglomeration, as urban theory would suggest.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where the american federal system recognizes strictly limited federal involvement n matters of state and local concern?
    7·2 answers
  • Cinco estrategias que los manarcas usaron para mantener su poder?​
    7·1 answer
  • Would Asoka make a good ruler today? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • Exploration such as the voyages of Captain James Cook can be seen as the precursor to
    8·1 answer
  • What Han invention was originally made using wood pulp?
    9·2 answers
  • Which important Revolutionary-era document did Thomas Paine write?
    15·1 answer
  • What economic system do the Yanomamo follow?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the importance of the Cotton Gin and the Railroad on the south.
    9·1 answer
  • 5. The Federalist supported the new Constitution because it would...
    9·1 answer
  • Write in detail about the'first farmers'and beginning of agriculture in india.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!