All categories

3 years ago

Problem situation:

Mathematics

2 answers:

Burka [1]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

these are the answers ;)

solution to both: 2,4

solution to inequality ONLY: -2,4.25,3 1/4

NOT a solution: 9 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

I plugged the variables for each one and found the answers

Vaselesa [24]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

solution to both: 2, 4
solution to inequality only: -2, 4.25, 3 1/4
not a solution: 9 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using x for the variable, the inequality will be ...

9.50 +3.50x ≤ 35

3.50x ≤ 25.50

x ≤ 51/7 ≈ 7.3

Anna cannot buy negative snacks, and she cannot buy fractional snacks. Of the numbers listed, only 2 and 4 are integers between 0 and 7 (inclusive). The values below 7.3 are all solutions to the inequality. The value 9 1/2 is too large to be a solution to the inequality.

Only 2 and 4 are solutions to both the problem and the inequality.

9 1/2 is not a solution.

You might be interested in

What is 13 7/10 times 7

Anon25 [30]

I would say the answer is 95.9 not to sure but I’m pretty confident

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

NEED HELP ASAP!!! 5-10 points Number three, what is the answer?

liraira [26]

Dario went -60 feet below

6 0

3 years ago

The image shows the distances in miles between three cities. How much closer is it to travel from Aurora to Clifton directly tha

murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

First we need to calculate the distance between Clifton and Burlington by using Pythagorean theorem:

x² + 65² = 97²

=> x² = 97² - 65²

=> x² = 5184

=> x = √5184 = 72 (m)

The total distance from Aurora to Clifton through Burlington is: 65 + 72 = 137 (m)

We have: 137 - 97 = 40 (m)

So it is 40 m closer to travel from Aurora to Clifton directly than from Aurora to Clifton through Burlington

7 0

3 years ago

A human resources representative claims that the proportion of employees earning more than $50,000 is less than 40%. To test thi

bearhunter [10]

Answer:

The statistic for this case would be:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}}$

And replacing we got:

$z= \frac{0.436-0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.436*(1-0.436)}{700}}}= 1.92$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following info:

$n =700$ represent the sample size

$X= 305$ represent the number of employees that earn more than 50000

$\hat p=\frac{305}{700}= 0.436$

We want to test the following hypothesis:

Nul hyp. $p \leq 0.4$

Alternative hyp : $p>0.4$

The statistic for this case would be:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}}$

And replacing we got:

$z= \frac{0.436-0.4}{\sqrt{\frac{0.436*(1-0.436)}{700}}}= 1.92$

And the p value would be given by:

$p_v = P(z>1.922)= 0.0274$

4 0

4 years ago

Question part points submissions used solve the given differential equation by separation of variables. dx + e2xdy = 0

lina2011 [118]

Try this:
if given dx+e²ˣdy=0, then
$dy=- \frac{dx}{e^{-2x}} \ =\ \textgreater \ \ \int dy=-\int e^{-2x}dx; \ =\ \textgreater \ \ y= \frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}+C;$

4 0

3 years ago