1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotykmax [81]
3 years ago
7

"Between 2000 and 2008, the price of oil increased from $30 per barrel to $140 per barrel, and the price of gasoline in the Unit

ed States rose from about $1.50 per gallon to over $4.00 per gallon. Unlike in the 1970s when oil prices spiked, there were no long lines outside gas stations. Why?'

Business
1 answer:
KiRa [710]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.

Explanation:

During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.

Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.

You might be interested in
How are the earning of workers determined?
goblinko [34]
<span>The same laws that determine the price of everything. Supply and demand. If there are many workers and few jobs then pay is low. If there are few workers and many jobs then the employers have to compete with other employers for workers and have to offer high pay and benefits to keep workers. At least that is how it should work. Sometime employers in a given field will make a "gentlemen agreement" amongst themselves to keep the pay the same across the industry to keep worker pay down and to prevent people from job hopping.

</span>Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Your co-worker, Bill comes into the office and tells you that he is going to play "hooky" and go golfing believing that the boss
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

d. a palter

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Kant would call this misleading statement a palter. This term refers to a statement that has been made ambiguous in order to hide the truth from someone or in order to avoid committing yourself to something. Which in this scenario "You" are trying to hide the fact that Bill is playing "hooky" from your boss.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Nancy's Notions pays a delivery firm to distribute its products in the metro area. Delivery costs are $32,000 per year. Nancy ca
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

a. Internal Rate of Return

Annual Cash Inflows = (Net Savings - Depreciation) * ( 1 - Tax Rate) + (Depreciation * Tax Rate)

Net savings = Delivery Costs - Operating and Maintenance Costs with the Used Truck  

= 32,000 - 21,000  

= $11,000

Depreciation = (Cost of used truck - Salvage value) / Useful life  

= (13,000 - 2,000) / 3  

= $3,667

Annual Cash inflows = $7,000 as there are no taxes.

Use Excel to calculate IRR as shown in the attachment.  

The cost of the truck is the outflow and the savings and the salvage value are inflows which means that the last inflow will be $13,000 because salvage value is added in the last year.  

IRR = 69.408%

b. If the IRR is greater than the cost of capital or required rate of return, the project should be chosen.

c. The IRR of 69.408% is greater than the MARR of 34% so Nancy should buy the truck.

4 0
3 years ago
The following lists are nations with mixed economies. In which list is the free market most dominant?. . A. France, Canada, Sout
Marizza181 [45]


A free market is a type of economy which allows the manufacturers and consumers to interact resulting to the relationship between the supply and demand market. This is different from the command market in which the government controls solely. One of the countries with strong free market economy are B. US, UK, HK and Singapore.
5 0
3 years ago
Mullineaux Corporation has a target capital structure of 70 percent common stock and 30 percent debt. Its cost of equity is 16 p
alexira [117]

Answer:

The company WACC is 13.30%

Explanation:

For computing the WACC, first we have to find the weight-age of both debt and equity.

Since in the question, the weightage of debt and equity is given which is equals to

Debt = 30%

And, Equity or common stock = 70%

So, we can easily compute the WACC. The formula is shown below

= Weighted of debt × cost of debt × (1- tax rate) + Weighted of equity × cost of equity

= 0.30 × 0.10 × (1 - 0.30) + 0.70 × 0.16

= 0.021 + 0.112

= 13.30%

Hence, the company WACC is 13.30%

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When managing your human resources, _____________ is the process of deciding who should be hired, under legal guidelines, to ser
    14·1 answer
  • What is a credit​ spread? A. The difference between the net worth of a borrower and the amount of the loan the borrower would li
    5·1 answer
  • Real estate appraisers are experts at 
    7·1 answer
  • En uhdbdjffbdjudjshddj
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that​ Roots' marginal cost of a jacket is a constant ​$100.00 and the total fixed cost at one of its stores is ​$1 comma
    9·1 answer
  • A bank will often hold government securities as an asset. If a bank were to sell $100,000 in government securities to an individ
    5·1 answer
  • The owner of Genuine Subs, Inc., hopes to expand the present operation by adding one new outlet. She has studied three locations
    9·1 answer
  • Why is franchising such a fast growing form of retail organisation
    6·1 answer
  • If $25,000 of fixed costs will be eliminated by discontinuing the Sporty line, how will operating income be affected
    10·1 answer
  • What are three key pieces of information that you can retrieve from the new car labels?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!