Options
A. By noting that no degree of phenotypical difference is implied by the term Macro evolution.
B. By suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
Answer:B. By suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
Explanation: Macro-evolution is the evolution that is above the specie level of evolution example can be seen in Vicariance which is an evolution based on specie selection, independent evolution.
Micro-evolution is the type of evolution that describes the change in allele frequency that takes place from time to time through Mutation,gene drift gene flow, Natural or artificial selection etc. Modern-day creationists sometimes misunderstood the contrast between microevolution and macroevolution by suggesting that Macro-evolution in contrast to Micro-evolution can not be explained or demonstrated by fossil records.
The correct answer is individual citizen.
A mixed market economy is one in which there is some government involvement in the economy but mainly consists of individuals making decisions for their own benefit. In the United States, we have a mixed market economy. Based on this information, you can better understand why an individual citizen has a majority of the power in this system.
Everyday, millions of Americans have the ability to choose how they spend their money. This can range from buying food, to electronics, and almost anything inbetween. In this mixed market economy, individuals are not limited by the government in terms of what they can buy. Rather, their own personal finances are what may set limits on what they consume.
Explanation:
After independence, Jawaharlal Nehru initiated reforms to promote higher education and science and technology in India.[2] The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)—conceived by a 22-member committee of scholars and entrepreneurs in order to promote technical education—was inaugurated on 18 August 1951 at Kharagpur in West Bengal by the minister of education Maulana Abul Kalam Azad.[3] More IITs were soon opened in Bombay, Madras, Kanpur and Delhi as well in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Beginning in the 1960s, close ties with the Soviet Union enabled the Indian Space Research Organisation to rapidly develop the Indian space program and advance nuclear power in India even after the first nuclear test explosion by India on 18 May 1974 at Pokhran.
India accounts for about 10% of all expenditure on research and development in Asia and the number of scientific publications grew by 45% over the five years to 2007.[citation needed] However, according to former Indian science and technology minister Kapil Sibal, India is lagging in science and technology compared to developed countries.[4] India has only 140 researchers per 1,000,000 population, compared to 4,651 in the United States.[4] India invested US$3.7 billion in science and technology in 2002–2003.[5] For comparison, China invested about four times more than India, while the United States invested approximately 75 times more than India on science and technology.[5] The highest-ranked Indian university for engineering and technology in 2014 was the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay at number 16;[6] natural science ranks lower.[7]
While India has increased its output of scientific papers fourfold between 2000 and 2015 overtaking Russia and France in absolute number of papers per year, that rate has been exceeded by China and Brazil; Indian papers generate fewer cites than average, and relative to its population it has few scientists.[8]
Answer: "mania" ; or, "manic episodes".
______________________________________________
Answer:
levers
Explanation:
A lever is a bar with a balance point called the fulcrum.
