Is this something to solve or a joke
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Neil excludes Polly from the benefits of stock ownership.
Polly may feel unfairly excluded from the benefits and could take up legal action against Neil for the issue. Given the inconveniences and unjust treatment suffered by Polly, they can file a lawsuit against Neil for damages.
Answer:
A) uses cooperative learning
Explanation:
In Mr. Alvarado’s classroom, small groups of students work toward common goals by considering one another’s ideas, appropriately challenging one another, and resolving differences of opinion on the basis of reasons and evidence. Mr. Alvarado cooperative learning. Cooperative learning is an approach which involves the splitting of a class into groups to discuss various class exercises. The aim of this method apart from helping the students learn also help in the social development of the student as the students interpersonal skills and confidence improved and It also teachers the students how to resolve differences among themselves based on facts and clear reasoning rather than through violent behaviour.
Answer:
The most compelling theory is that the birth of agriculture was facilitated by the end of the last glacial period, from 15,000 to 10,000 years ago (depending on the world region), which coincides with the era when agriculture first started.
The end of the last glacial period brought a warmer climate to many areas of the world, which meant that weather and soil conditions where more favorable for the cultivation of wild plants, and the domestication of animals.
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
