WAIT THIS IS THE STORY “ fish cheeks” RIGHT?
i did a quiz on this not too long ago
your answer is A! She describes the food as foreign and unappealing.
but correct me if i’m wrong, IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS LMK !!!
Answer:
In today’s modern world, education has come a really long way. Nowadays, schools are giving their pupils the chance to decide which subjects they are taught, even in early grades such as grade 6. This has sparked many debates on whether giving the students this opportunity is going to be beneficial or not. I believe that this can be advantageous for the students.
Firstly, giving students the opportunity to decide which subjects they are taught can greatly boost the students’ morale. Moreover, as they would be only studying what they want, they would be less likely to drop subjects. Also, the increased motivation can result in the students performing better in their studies. In addition, some students may choose less subjects if they are given this opportunity and this would allow them to spend more time and focus on the subjects of their choice.
Giving students the opportunity to choose which subjects they are taught can make the students feel more responsible. This is because they would feel that their performance is in their hands. This is likely going to make the students think more about their career. Also, they would be more compelled to do better in the subjects that they have chosen because these subjects would be somewhat or even directly related to their dream careers. Additionally, it would also make the students feel more free and independent.
In conclusion, due to its various benefits, I think that schools should be giving its students the opportunity to decide which subjects they are taught. However, there must also be some mandatory subjects like Mathematics and language that are essential for all professions.
True
~<span>stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.</span>
If we are to match the terms of the following logical fallacies with its definition, it would be:
A) The use of popular mass appeal to convince others that they should do/believe something because everyone else does/is
Bandwagon
B) The use of an extreme example that is highly unlikely to try to discredit the action or words of another
Strawman
C) The use of finger-pointing or name-calling to attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself
Ad Hominem
D) The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)
Circular reasoning
E) A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner
Non sequitur
F) The use of quick judgment that is not based on facts but instead on a very limited experience to what one is judging
Hasty generalization
<h3>What is Hasty Generalization?</h3>
This refers to the type of fallacy that is used when a person rushes into a hasty conclusion about a thing from incomplete facts, which is usually incorrect.
Hence, we can see that the correct matchings has been made above.
Read more about hasty generalization here:
brainly.com/question/2955537
#SPJ1
