1)22.578/2.13=10.6
2)659*95=<span>62605
3)</span><span>B. Numbers get smaller as you move to the left on the number line. </span>
The blue graph is translated 3 units to the left and two down, so the new equation would be g(x)=(x-3)^2-2
Answer:
Option B) Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 333
p = 48% = 0.48
Alpha, α = 0.01
Number of women belonging to union , x = 149
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a two-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.273079
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that proportion of homes in Oregon that were heated by natural gas is different from what was reported.
B. Do not reject null hypothesis, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of homes in Oregon heated by natural gas is different from the 48% that the US Department of Energy reported.
Answer:
d = 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply the equation by the inverse of the coefficient of the variable.
together = add
add the fractions
3 7/10 + 5 9/10
add the whole numbers first
3+5=8
add the fractions
7/10+9/10= 16/10
8 16/10
reduce 16/10 divide by 2
16/2= 8
10/2= 5
8 8/5
whole number changes to 9
8-5=3
denominator stays the same
9 3/5
Answer:
9 3/5
