Full question: Read the sample student claim. although many applaud the increased opportunities for research and communication afforded by the internet, it has actually brought more harm to society than good. which best addresses a potential counterclaim? there is a higher risk that information obtained on the internet is not as accurate as print sources. the internet provides access to information that would otherwise be unobtainable to the general public. many people are addicted to the internet and no longer spend valuable time exploring outside interests. development of the internet occurred from the late 1950s to the 1970s by a group of researchers and scientists.
Answer: The internet provides access to information that would otherwise be unobtainable to the general public.
Explanation:
A counterclaim is considering the claim that has a statement against the ones that we can find in the speech or in the text.
- We can find in this passage that the claim is about the internet as something bad. It has brought harms to the society, much more than the good and the counterclaim should have the argument that is going against this claim. This claim is in your answer and it is supporting the statement that internet is good because it is providing the information that is useful to many people and without it. Many of us would not know how to get to some information that we are needing.
Gatsby is not in the same class as Wilson. Gatsby is closer to Tom because they are both rich etc etc. Meyer Wolfsheim is closer to Gatsby. They both get their money illegally.
The plural of chief is chiefs
Answer:
Free will.
Explanation:
The choice of an individual to make up his own mind and decisions unimpeded is known as free will. This is a state of mind giving full access and authority to the individual to do what he wants and what he likes without being influenced or helped by an outside force or individual. This ability of the person to act without the help or forced will of someone else is infused on everyone and it is up to us on how we use our own free will. The issue of fate vs. free will had been an ongoing debate within philosophers, even theologians but there had been no definite solution to this debate.
Thus, we can say that<u> free will</u> is the philosophical position that holds that people have control over what they do and are free to chose to act other than the way they do.
