1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
3 years ago
7

Why were the articles of confederation replaced with the constitution

History
2 answers:
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
7 0
The constitution was more comprehensive and covered more
jonny [76]3 years ago
3 0
The articles of confederation were weak and gave all the power to the people and protected no individual rights. The laws it had also made the country start to fall apart such as no paying taxes. Without taxes the country could not separate itself. The edited version of the articles of confederation became the constitution
You might be interested in
When Malcolm X states, “You couldn’t have gotten me out of books with a wedge,” what can the reader infer?
o-na [289]

The reader can infer that malcolm X had an overwhelming desire to learn

The phrase  “You couldn’t have gotten me out of books with a wedge,” was written by Malcolm X when he's describing his experience in prison.

He wrote that he basically spent all of his time in prison by reading a book. He read books on library, during breaks , and  on his bunks. He believed that even if other people threaten to beat him with a wedge if he does not stop reading the book, he'd still choose to read.

4 0
3 years ago
Explain (counter) revolution:
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

: a revolution directed toward overthrowing a government or social system established by a previous revolution. 2 : a movement to counteract revolutionary trends. Other Words from counterrevolution Example Sentences Learn More about counterrevolution.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In the 1800s, what city was the most industrial in the South and was also the nation's tobacco center?
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Charleston

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true of the economic growth of the Aztec empire ?
Brut [27]
Economic growth depended upon the continued expansion of the empire.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of German leader Adolf Hitler’s Lebensraum policy?
    8·2 answers
  • Communism allowance for significantly more individual freedom than its rival economic system capitalism
    8·1 answer
  • What is one way the romen empire changed over time​
    11·2 answers
  • The Wisconsin Idea, which made city government more responsive, was development by
    11·2 answers
  • I need to right this essay today heres what it says River-valley civilizations developed in Sumer, Egypt, China, and the Indus R
    6·1 answer
  • Under the Articles of Confederation, the<br> government consisted of
    12·2 answers
  • What was Alexander Hamilton's leadership style like, and how did he express it through what he did?
    8·2 answers
  • The policy of glorifying military power and keeping an army prepared for war was known as
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was, and still is, part of the mission of the NAACP?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the 15th Amendment expand suffrage in the United States? HELP ASAP
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!