The answer is "<span>People will go to great lengths </span><span>not to look like fools in front of others".
</span>
The Asch Experiment, by Solomon Asch, was a well known test intended to test how peer pressure to accommodate would impact the judgment and independence of a test subject. The examination was basic in its development; every member, thus, was solicited to answer an arrangement from questions, for example, which line was longest or which coordinated the reference line.
The answer to this question is <span>draw the line as to what exactly was too strong of a shock.
After a certain amount of shock of delivered, the learners plea to stop the experiment increased according to the level of the voltage.
When the learners are encouraged that they could take more, they felt some mental reassurance that they could take more because they do not understand the thresold of other learners can do.</span>
The answer to this question is <span> "Tragedy of the Commons".
</span><span> "Tragedy of the Commons" refers to an economic view that believe the actions thaat people take in order to exploit resources will always based on self-interest that often amke people ignore all existing moral value in order to fulfill our self-interest
</span>
I'm sorry if some of these are wrong, but I just read the story and it sound likes Sir John Willard, Pharaoh, Rupert Bleibner,Tetanus, and Poirot died. Hopes this helps!
Answer:
The situation in Iran is very complicated because it is a regime that is very vocal against U.S. interests, that has important sources of wealth like oil and natural gas (even if the country itself is far from being wealthy or developed), and it has had access to uranium, which could be used to produce nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
However, forging a deal with Iran, with the support and in conjunction with the European Union, and other international organizations is a better alternative that direct confrontation with the country. The reason is that it is very difficult to topple the Iranian Regime, it enjoys popular support, and the country itself would be very hard to invade due to the mountainous terrain.
Doing nothing should never be an alternative in international relations, let alone when it comes to Iran. The cons far outweigh the pros, and Iran could use the time to become even more aggressive against U.S. interests and allies.
