Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Delayed Differentiation is a technique that companies <u>use to delay in product finishing.</u> This also helps in aligning supply and demand and customizing products.
Delayed Differentiation technique is used by <u>companies that have uncertainty of demand.</u>
In delayed differentiation, such companies use this technique to avoid surplus. In this technique, <u>companies produce specific-end items rather than finished-end items.</u>
So, the correct answer is option D.
Answer:
Scots-Irish Protestants
Explanation:
The Scots-Irish Protestants were the largest number of European immigrants to colonial America in the 18th and 19th centuries. Around 200,000 Scots-Irish Protestant people migrated from Europe to American in that era. They settled around Pittsburgh, New York, and Philadelphia, whereas the first group arrived and settled in New England.
Answer:
triangular trade
Explanation:
For the British slave traders it was a three-legged journey called the 'triangular trade': West African slaves were exchanged for trade goods such as brandy and guns. Slaves were then taken via the 'Middle Passage' across the Atlantic for sale in the West Indies and North America.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
In the early 1820s suffrage was denied to women
