All categories

3 years ago

The spoils system made political parties more powerful by

History

2 answers:

VikaD [51]3 years ago

5 0

Correct answer choice is :

<h2>D) Filling important government positions with party supporters.</h2><h2 /><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3 />

The title was in use in American politics as early as 1812, but it was made popular in a speech made in 1832 by Senator William Marcy of New York. In supporting one of President Andrew Jackson's appointments, Marcy said, To the victor belong the spoils of the opposition. In the spoils system, the president designates civil servants to government jobs especially because they are faithful to him and to his political party.

sergey [27]3 years ago

3 0

<em><u>(d) filling important government positions with party supporters. </u></em>

Further Explanations:

The spoils system or the patronage system is a political party practice in which the winning party was allotting the jobs to its supporters, friends and other family members. The term as derived from the senator William L.Marcy “To the victor belongs the spoils”. The phrase was said in reference to the triumph of Andrew Jackson in the year 1828. This system was totally against the merit system according to which job was entitled to the meritorious candidate, independent of the political intervention.

The term was broadly used in the United States where the Spoil system broadly practiced by the United States Federal Government. This system prevailed until the implementation of the Pendleton act of 1883 as a consequence of Civil reform system. The act replaced the spoil system to nonpartisan at the federal level. Though some jobs were still under the limitations of law and the president was given the authority to transfer the job and jobholders into the system permanently .

Learn More

1. according to the supreme court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina?brainly.com/question/2419144

2. the impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the supreme court. throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.?brainly.com/question/637963

3. in a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people?brainly.com/question/477236

Answer detail

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Topic:spoils system

Keywords:spoils system, senator, William L.Marcy, Andrew Jackson, political intervention, United States, Federal Government, Pendleton act, Civil reform system, federal level

You might be interested in

What consequences do you think the damage caused by the Civil War had on the South in years to come?

slega [8]

Answer:

Also, since most of the fighting in the Civil War was done in the South, there was <u>much damage to the land and to property.</u> As a result, the South had to be <u>rebuilt</u> after the Civil War ended. This led to a <u>diversification of the southern economy as more industries were built in the South</u>.

#answerwithquality #BAL

8 0

3 years ago

How did the u.s. Armed forces mobilize to fight World War Two?

Mashutka [201]

The outbreak of World War II spurred the mobilization of America military industrial might

7 0

3 years ago

Based on the cartoon, explain the authors point of view about the Munich Agreement

juin [17]

Answer:

The cartoon expresses a view of utter contempt for Chamberlain, who was the British Prime Minister at the time.

Explanation:

The Munich Agreement was signed by Britain, France, Italy (Germany's ally), and Germany, and what the pact allowed Germany to annex a portion of Czeckoslovakia named the "Sudeteland", mostly inhabited by Ethnic Germans.

Hitler had threatened with starting a war if the pact was not signed, and claimed that the Sudeteland would be the last land annexation of Nazi Germany in Europe.

British leader Chamberlain, and French leader Philippe Pétain believed in Hitler's word, and signed the agreement.

The agreement was obviously a failure, because only a year later Germany would launch the invasion of Poland, starting World War II.

For this reason, both Chamberlain and Pétain are seen by historians as ineffective leaders.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of these is considered part of a country’s in infrastructure? A)education B)job opportunities C)furniture D)hospitals E)la

Oksana_A [137]

The correct answer is - hospitals.

The infrastructure of a country is a set of built objects where services are offered, and people work, or are using them in their daily lives for their activities. In the infrastructure of a country also fall the schools, colleges, and universities, roads, airports, administration buildings, factories etc. They all have someone that works in them, something that offer, and are used, to and by the general public, and the more developed the infrastructure is, it usually means that the more developed the country itself is as well.

6 0

3 years ago

One of the terms of the Vietnam treaty was the provision for free elections in South Vietnam. TrueFalse

sveticcg [70]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago