Answer:
Scientist 1
Explanation:
<em>The conclusion of scientists 1 is valid.</em>
Human activities such as burning of fossil fuels, agriculture, deforestation, etc. leads to the emission of carbon in the form of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. <em>An increase in the population of a city will only lead to an increase in these activities and hence, an increase in the amount of carbon emitted into the atmosphere.</em>
Also, volcanic activities leads to the production of volcanic gases which is a mixture of carbon dioxide, oxides of sulfur, nitrogen, etc.
<u>However, an active volcano that is several miles away from the city might not be a major source of carbon in the air above a large city. The carbon dioxide produced from such volcanic activity thins out before reaching the city.</u>
Answer:
The correct answer is - B. It introduces new alleles into a population.
Explanation:
Gebe flow or migration is the transfer of the genetic material or transfer of genes from one population to another population of the same species. Gene flow is also responsible for the genetic change that leads to evolution.
Gene flow can contribute in various ways such as migration or vertical gene transfer parent to progeny, however, it can lead to evolution directly by introducing new alleles into a population.
Yes, they ate the only mammals which could fly because flying squirrels, possums or etc. could only glide for a short distance and time, unlike bats. There are no reptiles who could fly, but there are reptiles who could glide which I think is completely different. But they said that Pterosaur existed which they believed it is a flying reptile dinosaur. Just look it up. :)
Less gray matter is associated with schizophrenia and is denoted as option B.
<h3>What is Grey matter?</h3>
These are usually darker tissues which are found in the brain and spinal cord. They contain a rich network of neurons present.
This is therefore the reason why schizophrenia is associated with mental health.
Read more about Grey matter here brainly.com/question/13782390
#SPJ1
Answer:
Science has a central role in shaping what count as environmental problems. This has been evident most recently in the success of planetary science and environmental activism in stimulating awareness and discussion of global environmental problems. We advance three propositions about the special relationship between environmental science and politics: (1) in the formulation of science, not just in its application, certain courses of action are facilitated over others; (2) in global environmental discourse, moral and technocratic views of social action have been privileged; and (3) global environmental change, as science and movement ideology, is vulnerable to deconstructive pressures. These stem from different nations and differentiated social groups within nations having different interests in causing and alleviating environmental problems. We develop these propositions through a reconstruction of The Limits to Growth study of the early 1970s, make extensions to current studies of the human/social impacts of climate change, and review current sources of opposition to global and political formulations of environmental issues.
