Will mark brainlist Which were part of Georgia’s Constitution of 1777? Check all that apply.

History

1 answer:

astra-53 [7]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Georgia's first attempt at constitutional government was initiated in April 1776 by the Provincial Congress called by the Georgia Trustees in response to a series of mass meetings held throughout the colony. This document provided a framework for the transition from colony to state. Soon after Georgia accepted the Declaration of Independence, its first state constitutional convention was organized. Completed in February 1777 and executed without having been submitted to voters for ratification, this constitution remained in effect for twelve years. It vested most governmental authority in a state legislative body, incorporated the separation of powers doctrine, and included a number of basic rights, such as the free exercise of religion, freedom

I hope this helps!

You might be interested in

“More than in any other era, politics in the [late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries] was revolutionary politics. It did not d

Anna35 [415]

Answer:

a) In source one, the political revolution in American and French revolutions led to barring of old traditions of royal charisma and made ploitical authorities accountable. On the other hand, source 2 says that Fench revolution and revolution in America have thought to mark emergence of citizenship but in theiri times their lessons were inconclusive. The lessons and change were realized gradually.

b) American and French revolutions removed the weight of tradition and troyal charisma and held political authorities accountable to a community of citizens

c) Within empires spaces outside Europe it was unclear whether the idea of individual rights was a necessary revolution or restricted to a certain area of the world.

Explanation:

a) Refer to following lines from source 1: " the American and French revolutionaries expanded the whole horizon of the age, opening a path of linear progress, grounding social relations for the first time on the principle of formal equality, lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"

Refer to following lines from source 2: " The French revolution and those in North and South America have been transformed into founding myths in their respective countries and are thought to mark the emergence of citizenship, of national economies, of the very idea of the nation. But in their own time, the revolutions’ lessons were inconclusive

b) Refer to the following: "lifting the weight of tradition and royal charisma, and instituting a system of rules that made those in political authority accountable to a community of citizens"

c) Refer to the following: "and within empires’ spaces overseas it was unclear whether the idea of [individual rights] would be a contagious proposition or one [restricted to] a select few. ."

7 0

3 years ago

How did native Americans contribute to the war effort on the home front

Anna [14]

Working in war factories in the West is the correct answer :)

4 0

3 years ago

When did education become compulsory in the us?

ololo11 [35]

Education become compulsory in the United States of America in 1880. An Act was passed in 1880 which make it compulsory for parents to send their children to school until they are ten years of age. The right to education was extended to the blind and the deaf children in 1893.

6 0

4 years ago

In the first half of the 19th century, why did the U.S. Congress work to keep a balance between the number of slaveholding state

Anna71 [15]

The main reason why Congress worked to keep a balance between the number of slaveholding states and free states is because they wanted to avoid war breaking out between the North and the South. They tried to do this through a series of compromises that ultimately failed.

4 0

3 years ago

3) Is historical revisionist text important in the way we learn our history? How so?

Margaret [11]

Answer:

Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.

At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:

the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents

attributing false conclusions to books and sources

manipulating statistical data

deliberately mis-translating texts

This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.

8 0

3 years ago