The unanimous opinion in Brown v. Board of Education was written by Earl Warren.
<u>Further Explanation:-
</u>
<u>Brown vs Board of education was considered as the landmark decision which was made by the Supreme court of the United States in the year 1950</u>. This case started when a girl named Linda Brown who used to study in third grade and belonged to the black community had to walk more than a mile every day to reach her school which was made for segregated children whereas we talk about the school for the white children then it was only seven blocks away as during that period of time students of black and white community were not allowed to study in the same school.
Parents of Linda Brown wanted her to study in elementary school made for whites and many parents along with the father of Linda Brown asked for admission of their children in schools for white but the principal of that school denied their request and this case further accelerated and went to the supreme court as their stand was the schools were not following the rule of 'Separate but Equal'. <u>Finally, after years of argument, Parents of Linda Brown won the case and the ruling of this case was Earl Warren was the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court during that period of time.</u>
Learn more:
1. Why did Europeans ship goods to Africa during triangular trade?
<u>brainly.com/question/3791549
</u>
2. The closest the world came to war during the cold war was when the soviet union placed missiles on the Caribbean island.
<u>brainly.com/question/3182105
</u>
<u>
</u>
Answer details:
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – Earl Warren
Keywords –Earl Warren, Linda Brown, Segregation, Supreme Court, United States, Grade, Blacks, Whites, Education, Elementary.
<span>national security.
content.
defamation.
libel.</span>
Impeding - to delay or prevent by obstructing it/them.
so your answer is B. Obstructing; slowing down.
<span>When the Afrikaner-backed National Party Came to power in South Africa in 1948, it implemented its campaign promises in the form of high apartheid. This contrasted with the segregationist policies of the pre-war government. While much of that legislation was designed to restructure the organization of economic opportunity in South Africa, apartheid legislation lacked the trademark of systematic exploitation of native Africans (Butler 19). The English speaking whites who had held power before the war were sidelined as the white constituency was consolidated under the National Party, a Afrikaner dominated political group. This allowed the National Party to enact such legislation as the Population Registration Act, which enforced classification into four racial categories: white, Co loured, Asiatic, or native. The next high apartheid landmark was the Group Areas Act of 1950. This act enforced the separate areas of residence by race across the country. It would be this act that eventually led to Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act of 1959 that transferred Africans’ political rights to these quasi-states, which allowed the South African government to treat natives as foreigners and allow them no political representation in the South African government.</span><span />
I think the answer is A, but im not 100% positive
please dont be angry if its wrong.
I hope this helps you! :D
