The answer to the first unknown is "FRATERNAL TWINS" while in the second unknown is "SISTERS". Hence, we have it, Mia and Thalia are very similar to each other especially with respect to their appearances and to each other in the personality trait of openness. While Esther and Hannah are less similar to one another in openness. We can say that Mia and Thalia could be FRATERNAL TWINS, whereas Esther and Hannah could be SISTERS.
<span>a. famine</span><span>
Industrialisation affected the poor in a way that they, as manual labors, were replaced by machinery in order to do the tasks or jobs that were usually done manually. During industrialisation, agricultural society was replaced to a manufacturing one. Because of this, there was a lower demand for workers as many lost their jobs because of machinations. Due to the higher demand for jobs by these people, many of the poor people accepted jobs with low wages to compete for those others who are also in need of jobs. </span>
Archivald grimké, Oswald garrison Villard, Lillian wald, William English walling, Henry moskowitz, W.E.B du bois, ida B wells, and Mary white ovington
Answer:
missionaries were sent to spread the word of Christianity.
Answer:
No they don't, he regularly alludes to them as "uncouth" and requests that they be removed from their general public.
Explanation:
Morals and style topple over in favor of relativism in Virginia. "Countries raised to freedom and to decision themselves consider some other type of government colossal and in spite of nature. Those familiar with government do likewise". Montaigne relates the reality without condemning it: his long experience has instructed him that all judgment is nevertheless the declaration of propensity; thusly, nothing licenses him to assert that freedom is a decent, and its nonattendance a shrewdness; to esteem freedom would be confirmation of ethnocentrism, and to mask propensity as all inclusive reason. This would be significantly more apparent with regards to judgments about excellence: who couldn't refer to a few precedents outlining the insecurity of the human perfect? "It is likely that we know minimal about what excellence is in nature and by and large, since to our own human magnificence we give such a large number of various structures".
