A. Political independence from Europe
The correct answer to your question is C. Nasser
Answer:
it afforded greater long-term security
Explanation:
<em> it offered more opportunities for job training </em>– this is not the correct answer. Slave apologists from the west didn’t care much for job training opportunities.
<em>it afforded greater long-term security</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. Southerners who apologized slavery thought slaves actually benefited from this way of life where someone offers them control</u>, plan for life, and structured job.<u> In their ideas, slaves would be lost, frightened, even irresponsible if they had freedom. By enslaving them, they believed they gave them security and stability.</u> This kind of life, they argued, is better than workers who had jobs and freedom in the North, as slaves had proper care and protection.
<em>it was actually a "freer" relationship</em> – this is not the correct answer. The southern apologists didn’t claim slaves were freer in this type of relationship, just that it was better for them.
<em>it included women in the workforce </em>– this is not the case. The problem of women's work rights was not mentioned at the time.
If there is a 2/3 vote the veto is appealed and it becomes law
D I think???
Hope this helps
