1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kenny6666 [7]
3 years ago
8

Is unemployment considered government assistance

Law
1 answer:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer; yes you can say that

Explanation: its basically unemployment benefits

You might be interested in
What factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation?
devlian [24]

The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.

For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means

  • There are two types of tortious interference
  1. Tortious interference with contract
  2. Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
  • Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project

From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:

  • The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
  • The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
  • The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
  • The actions of defendant’s  led to a breach of the contract
  • The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
  • The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct

Learn more Tort interference from:

brainly.com/question/15058912

8 0
2 years ago
In a class of 54 students there are 6 more girls than boys what is the ratio of the number of boys to the number of girls.
xeze [42]

Answer:

24 girls 30 boys

Explanation:

You would need to divide the total number of students by 9 which would give you the value of six (54/9=6). Multiply the values in the ratio by six to get the actual breakdown of girls to boys. Since the ratio is 4 girls to 5 boys (based on the order of the sentence), there would be 24 girls and 30 boys in the class.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the data in the two tables, which statements are accurate? Check all that apply.
VikaD [51]

Answer:

A. Voters who were college graduates were more likely to support Clinton than Trump.

E. High income voters making over 100k were divided in their support for Clinton and Trump.

Explanation:

edge

3 0
2 years ago
Cases heard by the Supreme Court are named for the two or more parties who oppose each other. A party can be either an individua
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

Explanation:

The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.

In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.

Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

3 0
3 years ago
When vulnerable roadway users have to travel in the main stream of traffic
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ​Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If
    10·1 answer
  • When you have properly parked your vehicle in a straight-in parking space, your vehicle will be
    14·2 answers
  • Where does the CA state supreme Court meet to hear cases? Where else do they travel and why does this happen? I did some researc
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the first amendment so important to the success of American democracy
    5·2 answers
  • What are the roles of the Corrections component in the criminal justice system?
    10·1 answer
  • Which explains how advances in online education will most likely affect college costs in the future
    5·1 answer
  • Searches at the border of people entering the country are subject to reasonable suspicion, probable cause or a warrant.
    13·2 answers
  • The power of executive order is granted to the President by the
    14·1 answer
  • A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cr
    7·1 answer
  • How many of the original thirteen states must ratify/approve the constitution for it to take effect?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!