Answer:
2 Senators
Explanation:
Each state is represented by two senators regardless of its size. Conversely, in the House of Representatives, a state's representation is based on its population. For example, Kansas has four representatives and California has 53. This is because we have a bicameral legislature which acts as a check on the legislative branch so it does not become too powerful.
Answer:
They should inspect the property
Explanation:
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) was established in 1980. Its main purpose was to provide a regulations in response to threats to human health or the environment from hazardous waste sites.
First National must have forclosed Rayon chemical because there is release or possible release of harmful substance into the environment, Rayon chemical is liable or because of cost response.
Whatsoever the reason may be First National can inspect the property before Rayon chemical sells it off.
Yes, it would depend on the nation or state, but yes that 11 year old could be charged with abuse if the level of abuse hits a breaking point. It would also depend on how often this occurs, the severity, and actions taken by the parents to intervene. The more valuable proof would come from signs of abuse, such as trauma or bruising, but a video would suffice the start of an investigation. If you or someone you know is being abused, call 9-11 or 1-800-799-7233 (National Domestic Violence Hotline).
I hope this helps! And please stay safe.
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
Answer:
What is your favorite color?
Explanation:
I like ice cream :D
