1. In this passage from the Declaration of Independence, why did

History

2 answers:

den301095 [7]3 years ago

5 0

The answer I believe should be “A”

aalyn [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is option A. to emphasize the seriousness of colinists' reasons for declaring independence.

Explanation:

Thomas Jefferson decided to introduce the idea that one does not change a government for "light" causes to make it absolutely clear that what they were doing was what they had to do. They had tried to reach peaceful agreements with the British Parliament (such as the Petition to the King), but they were not heard. Their individual and citizenship rights had been violated and they were not protected, and those were heavy causes (not light causes) that backed up their decision to declare independence. They would not want to change the government out of nothing, that's what it means.

You might be interested in

how did the terms of peace from ww1 lead to the rise of totalitarian dictators specifically adolf hotler, benito mussolini, and

Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

the trety of versailles wasnt signed by germany they signed a seperate treaty they also pinned like the entire thing on germany so that ticked germany off

Explanation:

"accept the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage"

8 0

3 years ago

4. Why do you think so many facilities may have been built in Galveston?

dexar [7]

Answer:

Galveston is known across the US as one of Texas' top tourist destinations. It has something for everyone, including sandy beaches, a rich cultural heritage, and beautiful Victorian architecture.

5 0

3 years ago

Which nations were part of the Triple Alliance?

zloy xaker [14]

Germany and austria hungary

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Locke's theory on social contract was different from Hobbes' theory because Locke believed:

kipiarov [429]

The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed c) that the people could overthrow their ruler if that ruler was abusing their power.

<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>

Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.

Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.

In conclusion, option c is correct.

Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.

6 0

2 years ago

1. What was the significance of interchangeable parts?

algol13

Well....I would ASSUME that it's B. I'm just guessing here of course.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers