<u>Explanation</u>:
This is an example of a linear programming problem.
THE CONSTRAINTS
Let d, c represents number of desk and chair.
Marketing restrictions
c ≥ 2d; which can be written as
2d - c ≤0
Wood restriction
4d + 3c ≤ 20
OBJECTIVE FUCTION (MAX)
= 40d + 25c
Where d ≥ 0, c ≥ 0
With this details you can then find the solutions either graphically or using any other linear programming solution methods.
They wanted to ensure that the bill of rights was included in the constitution.
Answer:
shipment consolidation
Explanation:
The primary aim of the consolidation of shipments is to evaluate cost control and cost control. The aggregation of shipments allows individuals or businesses to save costs thereby integrating several products from different shippers into one shipment.
Therefore in the given case, since the company wants to combine 10 to 12 different orders into one shipment so that the company could save the cost
Hence, the shipment consolidation is correct
Answer:
Nominal Interest rate
Explanation:
According to liquidity preference theory, money supply and money demand are balanced by adjustments of Nominal Interest rate. Suppose you have some money, you will decide to either keep it in cash or in the bank. If you keep the money in cash, the opportunity cost of keeping in cash is the interest rate earned if you would have kept the money in the bank. Bank offers the nominal interest rates and not the real interest rates. Bank rates are not adjusted for inflation. So if the interest rate on money increases the opportunity cost of holding money in cash increases. If money supply in the economy increases the demand for money will increase only by reducing the interest rate because then only people fir hold cash and demand higher money. So, money supply and money demand are balanced by adjustments of the Nominal Interest rate.
Answer and Explanation:
A. Given that Design 1A will cost $1.7 million to build and $175,000 per year to maintain
Given that Design 1B will cost $3.6 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain
Both designs are assumed to be permanent
To find ROR using AW based rate of return equation, we find present value of each design and equate them:
Each design is permanent so
Present value of perpetuity:
Design 1A= 1700000+175000/r
Design 1B = 3600000+40000/r
=1700000+175000/r=3600000+40000/r
135000/r=1900000
Cross multiply
r=135000/1900000
r= 0.0710
r=7.10%
B Given that ROR=7.10% and MARR is 25%
MARR>ROR
Hence we reject both designs
