Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Explanation:
Organizations are integrated systems that use resources to achieve certain objectives and goals and become profitable and competitive.
Globalization was a phenomenon that contributed to an increase in the flow of information and changes in technologies and paradigms that contributed to a greater speed in consumer trends, and in the number of companies competing in the market.
Therefore, to achieve competitive advantage, it is not enough for the organization to use its resources in a conventional way, it is necessary to use strategies to add value to its processes. Considering the current business scenario, it can be said that the human resource in companies is the one that will give it a sustainable competitive advantage, since the knowledge acquired is one of the main resources used for the company to position itself in relation to competitors, each time more companies are promoters of social responsibility, so prioritizing knowledge and its stakeholders will always be the most advantageous option for creating value and competitive advantages.
<span>The speaker is using the fallacy of building on an unproven assumption. The speaker has made the assumption that the Japanese make the best stereo sound systems in the world. This is merely his/her opinion, and is not a proven fact. Thus, when the speaker bases another argument on that assumption, he has used a fallacy in reasoning.</span>
Answer: change the forecast category to omitted on the duplicate opportunities
Explanation:
The sales process should be modified to ensure opportunities are not double-counted in the pipeline by changing the forecast category to omitted on the duplicate opportunities.
When this is done, the multiple opportunities for the same end customer will be curtailed and hence, there'll be accuracy with regards to the pipeline report.
It would be an increase of $6.000 as <span>the effect in net income ($15 selling price less $13 variable cost (the original $12 plus the $1 shipping cost)) or $2 per scale. </span>
