1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natka813 [3]
3 years ago
15

How royal colonies differ from corporate colonies

History
2 answers:
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]3 years ago
8 0
Royal colonies were controlled by the king. Corporate colonies were privately funded and allowed investors to have a say in company decisions.
mojhsa [17]3 years ago
3 0

These were two ways in which the colonies of North America were administered. The colonies of North America were originally founded as corporate colonies. Corporate colonies were those who were governed by the king, but owned by stockholders. Examples of these were Virginia and Massachusetts.

On the other hand, royal colonies arose in the mid-1600s, and led to a decrease in the power of the governors. The king regained control of this land, and he was able to appoint his own officials to the colonies. This led to increased political dissatisfaction with England among the colonists.

You might be interested in
What was the main concern with the first draft of the Articles of Confederation?
laila [671]
The answer is A, too much power in the central government.

America had just experienced the rule of a tyrannical leader. They were afraid that if they gave the central government too much power, then they would end up going through the same problems again. So they ended up giving too much power to the states, and too little to the central government. Later on they had to change the rule because nothing was working out well. They owed other countries money and they figured that something had to change.
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following arguments serves to counter the notion that European culture is inherently more suited to industry and te
atroni [7]

Answer:

B: In 1750, core areas of Europe and Asia enjoyed similar levels of economic development

3 0
3 years ago
What would have happened if Missouri had joined the Union as a slave state?
MaRussiya [10]

On this date in 1821, Missouri entered the Union as the 24th state. It was the first one located entirely west of the Mississippi River.

By 1818, the Missouri Territory, part of the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, had gained enough settlers to qualify for statehood. Its settlers, however, had come mostly from the South and expected it would be a slave state. When a Missouri statehood bill came before the House, Rep. James Tallmadge of New York proposed amending the measure to bar bringing slaves into the new state and providing for the ultimate emancipation of all slaves born in Missouri. The House approved that approach in 1819. But the Senate refused to go along.

In early 1820, a bill to admit Maine passed the House. Alabama had come into the Union as a slave state in 1819. With Alabama's admission, there were an equal number of senators from free and slave states in that body. Since Maine would come in as a free state, proponents of admitting Missouri as a slave state argued that equality would be retained at 12 each by pairing the two.

The Senate then voted to bar slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri ? except in Missouri. Although the House rejected this compromise, conferees agreed that Missourians could adopt a constitution that permitted slavery.

But the House rebelled anew when a drafted state constitution barred bringing any free blacks into Missouri. The territorial legislature backed down and pledged that nothing in its constitution could be interpreted as abridging the rights of U.S. citizens. (Slaves were not citizens.) That deal held until 1854, when the Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. In 1861, when other slave states seceded to trigger the Civil War, Missouri chose to remain in the Union.

7 0
3 years ago
Which Greek leader was responsible for eventually loosening the harsh and uncompromising laws of leaders such as Draco?
galben [10]
It was Themistocles.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The church of england became the official church of the nation under whose reign?
diamong [38]
The church of England became the official church of the nation under whose reign?
ELIZABETH I
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was neutrality a difficult policy for the United States to maintain?
    7·2 answers
  • Because of the restrictions placed on African slaves in early colonial North America, much of what we know about their culture c
    15·2 answers
  • WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!
    11·2 answers
  • 13. Which of the following are infection control techniques?
    8·1 answer
  • Briefly explain the causes and the effects of the Spanish-American War.
    5·2 answers
  • Need help due today please help
    10·2 answers
  • Which empires tried to control iran and afghanistan in the 1800s?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following choices was a result of Soviet-U.S. conflict in Afghanistan?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a result of the Enlightenment? religious tolerance reason and logic being applied to the human wo
    14·1 answer
  • Answer to this ...... ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!