Hello!
I think it goues like this
King Menes pharaoh upper and lower Egypt, founded the capital city of Memphis, and established the first Egyptian dynasty. Egyptian pharaohs, like Menes, were also believed to be gods; this form of government, in which political leaders are also religious figures, is called a nomarch.
<u>I hope is all ggood!!! :)</u>
Their rights were to:
Hold office.
Own property.
Vote.
Defend in court.
Pass laws.
Chose officials.
Their responsibilities were:
Jury duty.
Fight when needed.
Soldiers.
Taxes.
Serve in government.
It was mainly the construction of railroads that helped cities thrive in the 1800s, while it was mostly the invention of the television that <span>had the most significant impact on the rise of mass entertainment in the late nineteenth century</span>.
Answer: Overconfidence
Explanation:
Before the attack on Adobe Walls, Quanah Parker and the other Indian attacker took part in a sun dance where a Comanche medicine man proclaimed that he had a vision where the Natives would win. He also said that bullets would not work on them.
This gave the Natives such confidence that they attacked the hunters so brazenly leading to many losses on their part. The Comanche eventually retreated on the sixth day after Quanah was injured.
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled in 1919 that Schenck violated the Espionage Act. His campaign included printing and mailing 15,000 fliers to draft-age men arguing that conscription (the draft) was unconstitutional and urging them to resist. According to Schenck, conscription is a form of "involuntary servitude" and is therefore prohibited by the 13th Amendment. People were told to exercise their rights to free speech, peaceful assembly, and petitioning the government. Charles Schenck was imprisoned for expressing his beliefs after the court upheld the Espionage Act as constitutional. Schenck requested a new trial after he was convicted of violating the Espionage Act in 1917. He was denied the request. Afterward, he appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed to review his case in 1919. This case later showed certain kinds of speech would be deemed illegal if it posed as a threat to the US’s needs.
Explanation: