<span>their primary difference can be defined as two companies that have different : business models
Amazon provide a medium so other sellers could sell their books through their sites. This way, they won't need any space for their house cause they sell other's product.
Meanwhile, barnes and nobles is a book retailer, which means they produce and put their own books to the stores.</span>
Answer:
30.92%
Explanation:
You find the answer by calculating the cost of equity using two methods; Dividend discount model and CAPM
<u>Dividend discount model;</u>
cost of equity; r = (D1/P0) +g
whereby, D1 = next year's dividend = 3.00
P0= current price = 13.65
g = dividend growth rate = 11% or 0.11 as a decimal
r = (3/13.65) + 0.11
r = 0.2198 + 0.11
r= 0.3298 or 32.98%
<u>Using CAPM;</u>
r = risk free + beta (Market risk premium)
r = 0.049 + (2.8 * 0.0856)
r = 0.049 + 0.2397
r = 0.2887 or 28.87%
Next, find the average of the two cost of equities;
=(32.98% + 28.87% )/2
= 30.92%
Answer:
c. because P > MC, a basic condition for efficiency is violated.
Explanation:
An unregulated monopoly is a market in which monopoly holders have control over goods and services, giving them the ability to do whatever they like. Under unregulated monopoly, having a free market is impossible as price gouging is always evident.
In unregulated monopoly a basic condition for efficiency is violated because price is greater than marginal cost (P > MC).
Where P is the price and MC is the marginal cost of goods.
The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
