Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Three-Fifth Compromise is your answer
In an effort to garner more congressional members, the South came out with the <em>Three-Fifth Compromise</em>, which means that slaves count as 3/5 of a person, which can greatly increase the population of the South.
~
Answer: 13,14,15,16,18,19, and 20 are opinion and the rest are claim.
Explanation:
1] Isolationism - a policy of remaining apart from the affairs or interests of other groups, especially the political affairs of other countries.
Intervention - the action or process of intervening.
Imperialism - a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force
2] Building the Panama Canal, 1903 - 1914. President Theodore Roosevelt oversaw the realization of a long term US goal - a trans-isthmian canal. Throughout the 1800s, American and British leaders and businessmen wanted to ship goods quickly and cheaply between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.
Answer:
2
Explanation:
The Ainu and the Okinawans
